Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Kimi K2.7 Code is 18% cheaper per million tokens than Claude Haiku 4.5. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 / $5.00 per million input/output tokens versus Kimi K2.7 Code at $0.96 / $3.97. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Moonshot AI pricing (https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat)

    Claude Haiku 4.5

    Anthropic

    $6.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $1.00

    Output

    $5.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    18%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Kimi K2.7 Code

    Moonshot AI

    $4.93blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.96

    Output

    $3.97

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.07 per million tokens by choosing Kimi K2.7 Code over Claude Haiku 4.5.

    Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    SWE-bench Verified. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2.7 Code
    Metric
    Claude Haiku 4.5
    Kimi K2.7 Code
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Moonshot AI
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-10-15
    2026-06-12
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+4%
    $1.00
    $0.96
    Output Price+26%
    $5.00
    $3.97
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $6.00
    $4.93
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    64K
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-02-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    100 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    73%
    71.2%
    87.9%
    0.2%
    30.5%
    30.5%
    43.3%
    47.5%
    5.9%
    39.2%
    4.0%
    50.7%
    76%
    83%
    80.7%
    95.6%
    68.7%
    80.7%
    96.4%
    8.9%
    27.6%
    60.3%
    0%
    10%
    30.1%
    71.9%
    81.1%
    57.9%
    50.0%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude Haiku 4.5 0|9 Kimi K2.7 Code

    Verdict

    Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: the bottom line

    Kimi K2.7 Code offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

    As of August 25, 2026, Kimi K2.7 Code is 18% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.96 per million input tokens and $3.97 per million output tokens ($4.93 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 / $5.00 per million tokens ($6.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code cost per million tokens?

    Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $1.00 input and $5.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI API pricing is $0.96 input and $3.97 output per million tokens via Moonshot AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

    Kimi K2.7 Code leads on SWE-bench Verified: Claude Haiku 4.5 at 73.3% vs Kimi K2.7 Code at 78.2%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code?

    Claude Haiku 4.5 supports a 200K token context window, while Kimi K2.7 Code supports 262K tokens. Kimi K2.7 Code offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

    Kimi K2.7 Code leads on 9 of 9 shared benchmarks versus Claude Haiku 4.5's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for production use?

    Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2.7 Code are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Kimi K2.7 Code has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2.7 Code in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude Haiku 4.5 through Anthropic and Kimi K2.7 Code through Moonshot AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Moonshot AI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2.7 Code?

    Claude Haiku 4.5 supports up to 64K output tokens per request, while Kimi K2.7 Code supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

    Claude Haiku 4.5 has a measured throughput of approximately 100 tokens/second. Throughput data for Kimi K2.7 Code is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2.7 Code from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00/M input and $5.00/M output. Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.96/M input and $3.97/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.