Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, DeepSeek VL2 is 84% cheaper per million tokens than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is $3.00 / $15.00 per million input/output tokens versus DeepSeek VL2 at $0.30 / $2.50. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); DeepSeek API pricing (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing)

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet

    Anthropic

    $18.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $3.00

    Output

    $15.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    84%
    cheaper
    Better value

    DeepSeek VL2

    DeepSeek

    $2.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $2.50

    129.3K ctx|Open Source
    Save $15.20 per million tokens by choosing DeepSeek VL2 over Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Claude 3.7 SonnetDeepSeek VL2

    Score vs price

    MMMU. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceClaude 3.7 SonnetDeepSeek VL2
    Metric
    Claude 3.7 Sonnet
    DeepSeek VL2
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    DeepSeek
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-02-24
    2024-12-13
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+900%
    $3.00
    $0.30
    Output Price+500%
    $15.00
    $2.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $18.00
    $2.80
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    129.3K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    129.3K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    42 tok/s
    22 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    8.0%
    84.8%
    78.5%
    93.2%
    0.9%
    35.8%
    86.1%
    54.8%
    80%
    96.2%
    75%
    51.1%
    91.2%
    81.4%
    86%
    93.3%
    78.1%
    76.1%
    62.8%
    92.4%
    79.6%
    79.2%
    22.5%
    80.7%
    61.3%
    63.6%
    81.1%
    68.4%
    46.4%
    72.4%
    84.2%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude 3.7 Sonnet 1|0 DeepSeek VL2

    Verdict

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2: the bottom line

    DeepSeek VL2 offers significantly lower pricing, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or DeepSeek VL2?

    As of August 30, 2026, DeepSeek VL2 is 84% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. DeepSeek VL2 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens ($2.80 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.00 / $15.00 per million tokens ($18.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2 cost per million tokens?

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $3.00 input and $15.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. DeepSeek VL2 DeepSeek API pricing is $0.30 input and $2.50 output per million tokens via Replicate. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or DeepSeek VL2?

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 70.3%. DeepSeek VL2 does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2?

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports a 200K token context window, while DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or DeepSeek VL2?

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus DeepSeek VL2's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or DeepSeek VL2 better for production use?

    Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and DeepSeek VL2 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, DeepSeek VL2 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and DeepSeek VL2 in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude 3.7 Sonnet through Anthropic and DeepSeek VL2 through Replicate with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and DeepSeek API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and DeepSeek VL2?

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while DeepSeek VL2 supports up to 129K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or DeepSeek VL2?

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet runs at approximately 42 tokens/second while DeepSeek VL2 runs at 22 tokens/second. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude 3.7 Sonnet or DeepSeek VL2 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output. DeepSeek VL2 costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output via Replicate.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.