Claude Opus 4.5 vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is 95% cheaper per million tokens than Claude Opus 4.5. Claude Opus 4.5 is $5.00 / $25.00 per million input/output tokens versus MAI-Code-1.1-Flash at $0.20 / $1.20. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.azure.com

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Microsoft pricing (https://ai.azure.com)

    Claude Opus 4.5

    Anthropic

    $30.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $5.00

    Output

    $25.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    95%
    cheaper
    Better value

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

    Microsoft

    $1.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $1.20

    256K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $28.60 per million tokens by choosing MAI-Code-1.1-Flash over Claude Opus 4.5.

    Claude Opus 4.5 vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude Opus 4.5
    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Microsoft
    License
    Proprietary
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2025-11-24
    2026-08-11
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+2400%
    $5.00
    $0.20
    Output Price+1983%
    $25.00
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $30.00
    $1.40
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    64K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-03-31
    N/A
    Throughput
    42 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    25.2%
    87%
    85.5%
    41.8%
    37.6%
    66.3%
    62.3%
    90.8%
    45.5%
    20.7%
    48.1%
    77.5%
    80.7%
    20.7%
    61.3%
    23.6%
    76.0%
    45.2%
    93.2%
    83.3%
    94.8%
    85.6%
    45%
    74.3%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude Opus 4.5 1|0 MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

    Verdict

    Claude Opus 4.5 vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash: the bottom line

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash offers significantly lower pricing, while Claude Opus 4.5 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Claude Opus 4.5 vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    As of August 20, 2026, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is 95% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens ($1.40 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00 / $25.00 per million tokens ($30.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.azure.com. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude Opus 4.5 vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash cost per million tokens?

    Claude Opus 4.5 Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $5.00 input and $25.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash Microsoft API pricing is $0.20 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Microsoft. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    Claude Opus 4.5 leads on SWE-bench Verified: Claude Opus 4.5 at 80.9% vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash at 72.6%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Claude Opus 4.5 vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    Claude Opus 4.5 supports a 200K token context window, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports 256K tokens. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    Claude Opus 4.5 leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus MAI-Code-1.1-Flash's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude Opus 4.5 or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash better for production use?

    Both Claude Opus 4.5 and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude Opus 4.5 and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude Opus 4.5 through Anthropic and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash through Microsoft with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude Opus 4.5 vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Microsoft API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.azure.com. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude Opus 4.5 and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    Claude Opus 4.5 supports up to 64K output tokens per request, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude Opus 4.5 or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    Claude Opus 4.5 has a measured throughput of approximately 42 tokens/second. Throughput data for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude Opus 4.5 vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude Opus 4.5 or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude Opus 4.5 vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.