Composer 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 33% cheaper per million tokens than Composer 2. Composer 2 is $0.50 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct at $0.22 / $1.80. Sources: https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2 and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Sources: Cursor pricing (https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    Composer 2

    Cursor

    $3.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.50

    Output

    $2.50

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    33%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

    Qwen

    $2.02blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.22

    Output

    $1.80

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.98 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct over Composer 2.

    Composer 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Composer 2
    Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Cursor
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-03-19
    2025-01-31
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+127%
    $0.50
    $0.22
    Output Price+39%
    $2.50
    $1.80
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $3.00
    $2.02
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    61.3%
    Roboflow Vision: SAM3 Birds
    89%
    Roboflow Vision: Local Video
    78%
    Roboflow Vision: RTSP Stream
    0%
    Roboflow Vision: Avocados
    80%
    Roboflow Vision: LPR
    39%
    68.7%
    55.8%
    31.1%
    Benchmark Wins
    Composer 2 2|0 Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

    Verdict

    Composer 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct: the bottom line

    Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while Composer 2 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Composer 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Composer 2 or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 33% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs $0.22 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens ($2.02 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Composer 2 costs $0.50 / $2.50 per million tokens ($3.00 blended). Sources: https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2 and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Composer 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Composer 2 Cursor API pricing is $0.50 input and $2.50 output per million tokens via Cursor. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct OpenRouter API pricing is $0.22 input and $1.80 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Composer 2 or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 69.6%. Composer 2 does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Composer 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    Composer 2 supports a 200K token context window, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports 1M tokens. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Composer 2 or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    Composer 2 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Composer 2 or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct better for production use?

    Both Composer 2 and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Composer 2 and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Composer 2 through Cursor and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Composer 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Cursor API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2 and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Composer 2 and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    Composer 2 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Composer 2 or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    Neither Composer 2 nor Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Composer 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Composer 2 or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Composer 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Composer 2 costs $0.50/M input and $2.50/M output. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs $0.22/M input and $1.80/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Cursor

    1 models

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.