Who ranks #1 on the AA-LCR leaderboard?
As of August 20, 2026, Muse Glimmer-30B by Meta ranks #1 on AA-LCR at 80%. API pricing is $0.35/M input and $1.50/M output.
As of August 20, 2026, Muse Glimmer-30B is #1 for AA-LCR at 80%. Ranked by long-context retrieval: can the model use a huge window, not just advertise one. 15 models in this index have a published AA-LCR score. AA-LCR leaderboard: rank models by AA-LCR next to live API token prices.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
The index
282 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.







As of August 20, 2026, Muse Glimmer-30B by Meta is #1 for AA-LCR at 80%. Ranked by long-context retrieval: can the model use a huge window, not just advertise one. This board also tracks AA-LCR. Next on the same board: Hy3 and Mistral Small 4. This aa-lcr leaderboard ranks models by AA-LCR. Scores come from public evals. Prices are the live API rates in the table above.
Sources: OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)
| Rank | Model | AA-LCR | Input /M | Output /M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muse Glimmer-30B | 80% | $0.35 | $1.50 |
| 2 | Hy3 | 73.4% | $0.13 | $0.53 |
| 3 | Mistral Small 4 | 71.2% | $0.15 | $0.60 |
| 4 | Solar Pro 4 | 71% | $0.30 | $1.20 |
| 5 | Kimi K2.5 | 70% | $0.59 | $3.09 |
| 6 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | 68.7% | $0.60 | $3.60 |
| 7 | Qwen3.6 Plus | 68.3% | $0.50 | $3.00 |
| 8 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | 66.9% | $0.40 | $3.20 |
Rank one eval at a time. All LLM benchmarks.
As of August 20, 2026, Muse Glimmer-30B by Meta ranks #1 on AA-LCR at 80%. API pricing is $0.35/M input and $1.50/M output.
The current AA-LCR ranking as of August 20, 2026 is 1. Muse Glimmer-30B at 80%; 2. Hy3 at 73.4%; 3. Mistral Small 4 at 71.2%.
Qwen3.5-9B is the cheapest scored model on this aa-lcr leaderboard at $0.10/M input and $0.15/M output ($0.25 blended). Muse Glimmer-30B still leads AA-LCR at 80%.
Not automatically. Muse Glimmer-30B leads AA-LCR, but a cheaper scored model can be the better production choice if the quality gap is small. Use the table to weigh AA-LCR against input/output price, context window, and related evals.
Scores and API prices on this page are refreshed from published evals and provider rates. The snapshot is labeled August 20, 2026. Treat it as a current index, not a one-off blog post.
AA-LCR is a public LLM eval (long-context retrieval: can the model use a huge window, not just advertise one.). This page ranks models that have published a score, next to live API prices.
This page is the AA-LCR leaderboard. Models are sorted by AA-LCR, with input and output token prices on the same row so you can weigh score against cost. Official boards often omit price; that comparison is the point of this index.
Official eval pages own the methodology. This page keeps the published AA-LCR score next to live API $/M so you can pick a production SKU, not only a trophy number.