AnotherWrapper
    $249
    LLMImageVideoSpeechTranscription

    BrowseComp

    🏆 Leaderboard

    As of August 20, 2026, Kimi K3 is #1 for BrowseComp at 91.2%. Ranked by the BrowseComp score 59 models in this index have a published BrowseComp score. Methodology: BrowseComp (OpenAI) (https://openai.com/index/browsecomp/). BrowseComp leaderboard with live API prices. BrowseComp — evaluates web browsing and information retrieval across complex multi-step research tasks. Official methodology: BrowseComp (OpenAI) (https://openai.com/index/browsecomp/).

    Updated August 20, 2026282 models33 providers
    Kimi K3OSS
    Moonshot AI · Open Source
    		91.2%$18.00
    Claude Opus 5
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		90.8%$30.00
    GPT-5.6 Sol
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		90.4%$35.00
    GPT-5.5 Pro
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		90.1%$540.00
    Claude Mythos 5
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		88%$60.00
    GPT-5.6 Terra
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		87.5%$14.00
    Claude Mythos Preview
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		86.9%$60.00
    Kimi K2.6OSS
    Moonshot AI · Open Source
    		86.3%$4.93
    Gemini 3.1 Pro
    Google · Proprietary
    		85.9%$17.50
    Seed 2.1 Turbo
    ByteDance · Proprietary
    		84.9%$3.00
    Claude Sonnet 5
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		84.7%$12.00
    GPT-5.5
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		84.4%$35.00
    Claude Opus 4.8
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		84.3%$30.00
    Hy3OSS
    Tencent · Open Source
    		84.2%$0.66
    Claude Opus 4.6
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		84%$30.00
    MiniMax M3OSS
    MiniMax · Open Source
    		83.5%$1.50
    DeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxOSS
    DeepSeek · Open Source
    		83.4%$5.22
    GPT-5.6 Luna
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		83.3%$1.40
    GPT-5.4
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		82.7%$17.50
    GLM-5.1OSS
    Z AI · Open Source
    		79.3%$5.80
    Claude Opus 4.7
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		79.3%$30.00
    GPT-5.2 Pro
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		77.9%$189.00
    Inkling-SmallOSS
    Thinking Machines · Open Source · via Thinking Machines Lab
    		77.4%$1.50
    Seed 2.0 Pro
    ByteDance · Proprietary
    		77.3%$3.50
    MiniMax M2.5OSS
    MiniMax · Open Source
    		76.3%$1.50
    GLM-5OSS
    Z AI · Open Source
    		75.9%$4.20
    Kimi K2.5OSS
    Moonshot AI · Open Source
    		74.9%$3.68
    Claude Sonnet 4.6
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		74.7%$18.00
    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxOSS
    DeepSeek · Open Source
    		73.2%$0.42
    Step-3.5-FlashOSS
    StepFun · Open Source
    		69%$0.50
    Qwen3.5-397B-A17BOSS
    Qwen · Open Source
    		69%$4.20
    GPT-5.2
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		65.8%$15.75
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10BOSS
    Qwen · Open Source
    		63.8%$3.60
    MiniMax M2.1OSS
    MiniMax · Open Source
    		62%$1.50
    Qwen3.5-35B-A3BOSS
    Qwen · Open Source
    		61%$2.25
    Qwen3.5-27BOSS
    Qwen · Open Source
    		61%$2.70
    Kimi K2-Thinking-0905OSS
    Moonshot AI · Open Source
    		60.2%$2.47
    MiMo-V2-FlashOSS
    Xiaomi · Open Source
    		58.3%$0.40
    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601OSS
    Meituan · Open Source
    		56.6%$1.50
    GPT-5
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		54.9%$11.25
    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423OSS
    DeepSeek · Open Source
    		53.5%$0.30
    GLM-4.7OSS
    Z AI · Open Source
    		52%$2.80
    o4-mini
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		51.5%$5.50
    DeepSeek-V3.2OSS
    DeepSeek · Open Source · via OpenRouter
    		51.4%$0.57
    o3
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		49.7%$10.00
    Solar Pro 4
    Upstage · Proprietary
    		49.2%$1.50
    Mistral Medium 3.5OSS
    Mistral · Open Source · via Mistral AI
    		48.6%$9.00
    GLM-4.6OSS
    Z AI · Open Source
    		45.1%$2.80
    Grok 4 Fast
    xAI · Proprietary
    		44.9%$0.70
    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)OSS
    NVIDIA · Open Source · via OpenRouter
    		44.4%$2.70
    Showing 1–50 of 282 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.

    Get the stack — $249Have us build it with you

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    282 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    OpenAI51Anthropic22Google25Cursor2xAI15DeepSeek16MiniMax6Qwen38AI21 Labs2Amazon5Baidu1ByteDance2Cohere3IBM1Inception1inclusionAI1LG AI Research1Meituan4Meta12Microsoft5Mistral23Moonshot AI9Nous Research1NVIDIA5Poolside2Sakana AI1StepFun1Tencent1Thinking Machines1Unisound1Upstage1Xiaomi3Z AI20

    Baidu

    1 models
    ERNIE 4.5

    Inception

    1 models
    Mercury 2

    inclusionAI

    1 models
    Ling-3.0-flash

    LG AI Research

    1 models
    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

    Nous Research

    1 models
    Hermes 3 70B

    Sakana AI

    1 models
    Sakana Namazu

    StepFun

    1 models
    Step-3.5-Flash

    Tencent

    1 models
    Hy3

    Thinking Machines

    1 models
    Inkling-Small

    Unisound

    1 models
    U2

    Upstage

    1 models
    Solar Pro 4

    Which model leads BrowseComp right now?

    As of August 20, 2026, Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI is #1 for BrowseComp at 91.2%. Ranked by the BrowseComp score This board also tracks BrowseComp. Next on the same board: Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. This browsecomp leaderboard ranks models by BrowseComp. Scores come from public evals. Prices are the live API rates in the table above.

    Sources: BrowseComp (OpenAI) (https://openai.com/index/browsecomp/); OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)

    Top 8 for browsecomp. Ranked by the BrowseComp score Input and output are dollars per million tokens.
    RankModelBrowseCompInput /MOutput /M
    1Kimi K391.2%$3.00$15.00
    2Claude Opus 590.8%$5.00$25.00
    3GPT-5.6 Sol90.4%$5.00$30.00
    4GPT-5.5 Pro90.1%$60.00$480.00
    5Claude Mythos 588%$10.00$50.00
    6GPT-5.6 Terra87.5%$2.00$12.00
    7Claude Mythos Preview86.9%$10.00$50.00
    8Kimi K2.686.3%$0.96$3.97

    Related LLM leaderboards

    LLM LeaderboardCodingMathAgenticReasoningWritingScienceFinanceLong ContextVisionOpen Source

    Individual benchmark pages

    Rank one eval at a time. All LLM benchmarks.

    HLESWE BenchHumanity's Last Exam (No Tools)Humanity's Last Exam (With Tools)Terminal-Bench 2.0Terminal-BenchTerminal-Bench 2.1Terminal-Bench 2Terminal-Bench 3.0ARC-AGI-1 Verified

    BrowseComp FAQ

    Who ranks #1 on the BrowseComp leaderboard?

    As of August 20, 2026, Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI ranks #1 on BrowseComp at 91.2%. API pricing is $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output.

    What are the top models on BrowseComp?

    The current BrowseComp ranking as of August 20, 2026 is 1. Kimi K3 at 91.2%; 2. Claude Opus 5 at 90.8%; 3. GPT-5.6 Sol at 90.4%.

    Which browsecomp model is the cheapest?

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is the cheapest scored model on this browsecomp leaderboard at $0.05/M input and $0.20/M output ($0.25 blended). Kimi K3 still leads BrowseComp at 91.2%.

    Should I always pick the #1 BrowseComp model?

    Not automatically. Kimi K3 leads BrowseComp, but a cheaper scored model can be the better production choice if the quality gap is small. Use the table to weigh BrowseComp against input/output price, context window, and related evals.

    How often is the BrowseComp leaderboard updated?

    Scores and API prices on this page are refreshed from published evals and provider rates. The snapshot is labeled August 20, 2026. Treat it as a current index, not a one-off blog post.

    What is BrowseComp?

    BrowseComp — evaluates web browsing and information retrieval across complex multi-step research tasks. This page ranks models that have published a BrowseComp score, with live API token prices on the same row. Official methodology: BrowseComp (OpenAI) (https://openai.com/index/browsecomp/).

    Where is the BrowseComp leaderboard?

    This page is the BrowseComp leaderboard. Models are sorted by BrowseComp, with input and output token prices on the same row so you can weigh score against cost. Official boards often omit price; that comparison is the point of this index.

    How is this BrowseComp ranking different from the official board?

    The official BrowseComp (OpenAI) page owns the methodology. This page keeps the published BrowseComp score next to live API $/M so you can pick a production SKU, not only a trophy number. Source: https://openai.com/index/browsecomp/