AnotherWrapper
    $249
    LLMImageVideoSpeechTranscription

    HumanEval

    🏆 Leaderboard

    As of August 20, 2026, Kimi K2 0905 is #1 for HumanEval at 94.5%. Ranked by the HumanEval score 51 models in this index have a published HumanEval score. Methodology: HumanEval (https://github.com/openai/human-eval). HumanEval leaderboard with live API prices. Measures functional code generation — the model writes Python functions from docstrings and is evaluated on unit tests. Official methodology: HumanEval (https://github.com/openai/human-eval).

    Updated August 20, 2026282 models33 providers
    Kimi K2 0905
    Moonshot AI · Proprietary
    		94.5%$3.10
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		93.7%$18.00
    GPT-5
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		93.4%$11.25
    Kimi K2 InstructOSS
    Moonshot AI · Open Source
    		93.3%$1.00
    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B InstructOSS
    Qwen · Open Source
    		92.7%$0.18
    o1-mini
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		92.4%$15.00
    Mistral Large 2OSS
    Mistral · Open Source · via Mistral AI
    		92%$8.00
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		92%$18.00
    GPT-4o
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		90.2%$12.50
    Granite 3.3 8B InstructOSS
    IBM · Open Source
    		89.7%$1.00
    Nova Pro
    Amazon · Proprietary
    		89%$4.00
    Llama 3.1 405B InstructOSS
    Meta · Open Source
    		89%$1.78
    DeepSeek-V2.5OSS
    DeepSeek · Open Source
    		89%$0.42
    Mistral Small 3.1 24B InstructOSS
    Mistral · Open Source · via OpenRouter
    		88.4%$0.91
    LongCat-Flash-ChatOSS
    Meituan · Open Source
    		88.4%$1.50
    Llama 3.3 70B InstructOSS
    Meta · Open Source
    		88.4%$0.40
    Grok-2
    xAI · Proprietary
    		88.4%$12.00
    Gemini 2.5 Pro
    Google · Proprietary
    		88.2%$11.25
    o1
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		88.1%$75.00
    Claude 3.5 Haiku
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		88.1%$4.80
    Gemma 3 27BOSS
    Google · Open Source
    		87.8%$0.30
    GPT-4o mini
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		87.2%$0.75
    GPT-4 Turbo
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		87.1%$40.00
    Qwen2.5 72B InstructOSS
    Qwen · Open Source
    		86.6%$0.75
    Nova Lite
    Amazon · Proprietary
    		85.4%$0.30
    Gemma 3 12BOSS
    Google · Open Source
    		85.4%$0.15
    GLM-4.7OSS
    Z AI · Open Source
    		84.9%$2.80
    Claude 3 Opus
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		84.9%$90.00
    Qwen2.5 7B InstructOSS
    Qwen · Open Source
    		84.8%$0.60
    Mistral Small 3 24B InstructOSS
    Mistral · Open Source · via Mistral AI
    		84.8%$0.21
    Gemini 1.5 Pro
    Google · Proprietary
    		84.1%$12.50
    Phi 4OSS
    Microsoft · Open Source
    		82.6%$0.21
    Nova Micro
    Amazon · Proprietary
    		81.1%$0.17
    Llama 3.1 70B InstructOSS
    Meta · Open Source
    		80.5%$0.40
    Claude 3 Haiku
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		75.9%$1.50
    MiMo-V2.5-ProOSS
    Xiaomi · Open Source
    		75.6%$1.30
    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
    Google · Proprietary
    		75%$60.00
    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
    Google · Proprietary
    		74.4%$0.37
    Gemini 1.5 Flash
    Google · Proprietary
    		74.3%$0.75
    Claude 3 Sonnet
    Anthropic · Proprietary
    		73%$18.00
    Llama 3.1 8B InstructOSS
    Meta · Open Source
    		72.6%$0.06
    Pixtral-12BOSS
    Mistral · Open Source · via Mistral AI
    		72%$0.30
    Jamba 1.5 LargeOSS
    AI21 Labs · Open Source
    		71.3%$10.00
    Gemma 3 4BOSS
    Google · Open Source
    		71.3%$0.06
    GPT-3.5 Turbo
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		68%$2.00
    GPT-4
    OpenAI · Proprietary
    		67%$90.00
    Phi-3.5-mini-instructOSS
    Microsoft · Open Source
    		62.8%$0.20
    Jamba 1.5 MiniOSS
    AI21 Labs · Open Source
    		62.8%$0.60
    Gemma 2 27BOSS
    Google · Open Source · via OpenRouter
    		51.8%$1.30
    Ministral 8B InstructOSS
    Mistral · Open Source · via Mistral AI
    		34.8%$0.20
    Showing 1–50 of 282 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.

    Get the stack — $249Have us build it with you

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    282 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    OpenAI51Anthropic22Google25Cursor2xAI15DeepSeek16MiniMax6Qwen38AI21 Labs2Amazon5Baidu1ByteDance2Cohere3IBM1Inception1inclusionAI1LG AI Research1Meituan4Meta12Microsoft5Mistral23Moonshot AI9Nous Research1NVIDIA5Poolside2Sakana AI1StepFun1Tencent1Thinking Machines1Unisound1Upstage1Xiaomi3Z AI20

    Baidu

    1 models
    ERNIE 4.5

    Inception

    1 models
    Mercury 2

    inclusionAI

    1 models
    Ling-3.0-flash

    LG AI Research

    1 models
    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

    Nous Research

    1 models
    Hermes 3 70B

    Sakana AI

    1 models
    Sakana Namazu

    StepFun

    1 models
    Step-3.5-Flash

    Tencent

    1 models
    Hy3

    Thinking Machines

    1 models
    Inkling-Small

    Unisound

    1 models
    U2

    Upstage

    1 models
    Solar Pro 4

    Which model leads HumanEval right now?

    As of August 20, 2026, Kimi K2 0905 by Moonshot AI is #1 for HumanEval at 94.5%. Ranked by the HumanEval score This board also tracks HumanEval. Next on the same board: Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-5. This humaneval leaderboard ranks models by HumanEval. Scores come from public evals. Prices are the live API rates in the table above.

    Sources: HumanEval (https://github.com/openai/human-eval); OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)

    Top 8 for humaneval. Ranked by the HumanEval score Input and output are dollars per million tokens.
    RankModelHumanEvalInput /MOutput /M
    1Kimi K2 090594.5%$0.60$2.50
    2Claude 3.5 Sonnet93.7%$3.00$15.00
    3GPT-593.4%$1.25$10.00
    4Kimi K2 Instruct93.3%$0.50$0.50
    5Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct92.7%$0.09$0.09
    6o1-mini92.4%$3.00$12.00
    7Mistral Large 292%$2.00$6.00
    8Claude 3.5 Sonnet92%$3.00$15.00

    Related LLM leaderboards

    LLM LeaderboardCodingMathAgenticReasoningWritingScienceFinanceLong ContextVisionOpen Source

    Individual benchmark pages

    Rank one eval at a time. All LLM benchmarks.

    HLESWE BenchHumanity's Last Exam (No Tools)Humanity's Last Exam (With Tools)Terminal-Bench 2.0Terminal-BenchTerminal-Bench 2.1Terminal-Bench 2Terminal-Bench 3.0ARC-AGI-1 Verified

    HumanEval FAQ

    Who ranks #1 on the HumanEval leaderboard?

    As of August 20, 2026, Kimi K2 0905 by Moonshot AI ranks #1 on HumanEval at 94.5%. API pricing is $0.60/M input and $2.50/M output.

    What are the top models on HumanEval?

    The current HumanEval ranking as of August 20, 2026 is 1. Kimi K2 0905 at 94.5%; 2. Claude 3.5 Sonnet at 93.7%; 3. GPT-5 at 93.4%.

    Which humaneval model is the cheapest?

    Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is the cheapest scored model on this humaneval leaderboard at $0.03/M input and $0.03/M output ($0.06 blended). Kimi K2 0905 still leads HumanEval at 94.5%.

    Should I always pick the #1 HumanEval model?

    Not automatically. Kimi K2 0905 leads HumanEval, but a cheaper scored model can be the better production choice if the quality gap is small. Use the table to weigh HumanEval against input/output price, context window, and related evals.

    How often is the HumanEval leaderboard updated?

    Scores and API prices on this page are refreshed from published evals and provider rates. The snapshot is labeled August 20, 2026. Treat it as a current index, not a one-off blog post.

    What is HumanEval?

    Measures functional code generation — the model writes Python functions from docstrings and is evaluated on unit tests. This page ranks models that have published a HumanEval score, with live API token prices on the same row. Official methodology: HumanEval (https://github.com/openai/human-eval).

    Where is the HumanEval leaderboard?

    This page is the HumanEval leaderboard. Models are sorted by HumanEval, with input and output token prices on the same row so you can weigh score against cost. Official boards often omit price; that comparison is the point of this index.

    How is this HumanEval ranking different from the official board?

    The official HumanEval page owns the methodology. This page keeps the published HumanEval score next to live API $/M so you can pick a production SKU, not only a trophy number. Source: https://github.com/openai/human-eval