Gemini 2.0 Flash vs LFM2.5-VL-3B

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, LFM2.5-VL-3B is 70% cheaper per million tokens than Gemini 2.0 Flash. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens versus LFM2.5-VL-3B at $0.05 / $0.10. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.liquid.ai

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Liquid AI pricing (https://www.liquid.ai)

    Gemini 2.0 Flash

    Google

    $0.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.40

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    70%
    cheaper
    Better value

    LFM2.5-VL-3B

    Liquid AI

    $0.15blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.05

    Output

    $0.10

    65.5K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.35 per million tokens by choosing LFM2.5-VL-3B over Gemini 2.0 Flash.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash vs LFM2.5-VL-3B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Gemini 2.0 Flash
    LFM2.5-VL-3B
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Liquid AI
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-12-01
    2026-08-12
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+100%
    $0.10
    $0.05
    Output Price+300%
    $0.40
    $0.10
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.50
    $0.15
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    65.5K
    Max Output Tokens
    8.2K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2024-08-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    183 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    6.6%
    62.1%
    62.1%
    82.3%
    25.8%
    1.3%
    51.8%
    30.5%
    53.6%
    89.7%
    60.4%
    79.7%
    70.7%
    89.7%
    32.5%
    56.9%
    61.5%
    81.3%
    39.2%
    91.1%
    71.5%
    73.1%
    60.6%
    73.1%
    76.4%
    48.4%
    63.3%
    69.2%
    58.3%
    59.4%
    92.9%
    84.2%
    88.7%
    73.1%
    87.9%
    35.4%
    84.3%
    56.3%

    Verdict

    Gemini 2.0 Flash vs LFM2.5-VL-3B: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. LFM2.5-VL-3B has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Gemini 2.0 Flash's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash vs LFM2.5-VL-3B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.0 Flash or LFM2.5-VL-3B?

    As of August 30, 2026, LFM2.5-VL-3B is 70% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. LFM2.5-VL-3B costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.15 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10 / $0.40 per million tokens ($0.50 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.liquid.ai. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemini 2.0 Flash vs LFM2.5-VL-3B cost per million tokens?

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Gemini API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Google. LFM2.5-VL-3B Liquid AI API pricing is $0.05 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via Liquid AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.0 Flash or LFM2.5-VL-3B?

    Gemini 2.0 Flash has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 13.5%. LFM2.5-VL-3B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemini 2.0 Flash vs LFM2.5-VL-3B?

    Gemini 2.0 Flash supports a 1M token context window, while LFM2.5-VL-3B supports 66K tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemini 2.0 Flash or LFM2.5-VL-3B?

    Shared benchmark scores for Gemini 2.0 Flash and LFM2.5-VL-3B are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemini 2.0 Flash or LFM2.5-VL-3B better for production use?

    Both Gemini 2.0 Flash and LFM2.5-VL-3B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, LFM2.5-VL-3B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemini 2.0 Flash and LFM2.5-VL-3B in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemini 2.0 Flash through Google and LFM2.5-VL-3B through Liquid AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemini 2.0 Flash vs LFM2.5-VL-3B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Liquid AI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.liquid.ai. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemini 2.0 Flash and LFM2.5-VL-3B?

    Gemini 2.0 Flash supports up to 8K output tokens per request, while LFM2.5-VL-3B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemini 2.0 Flash or LFM2.5-VL-3B?

    Gemini 2.0 Flash has a measured throughput of approximately 183 tokens/second. Throughput data for LFM2.5-VL-3B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemini 2.0 Flash vs LFM2.5-VL-3B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemini 2.0 Flash or LFM2.5-VL-3B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash vs LFM2.5-VL-3B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output. LFM2.5-VL-3B costs $0.05/M input and $0.10/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.