Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

    Comparison

    As of September 2, 2026, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is 43% cheaper per million tokens than Gemma 4 26B-A4B. Gemma 4 26B-A4B is $0.13 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens versus Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor at $0.10 / $0.20. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://dev.meta.ai/docs/pricing-rate-limits/

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Meta pricing (https://dev.meta.ai/docs/pricing-rate-limits/)

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B

    Google

    $0.53blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.13

    Output

    $0.40

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    43%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

    Meta

    $0.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.20

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    Save $0.23 per million tokens by choosing Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor over Gemma 4 26B-A4B.

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Gemma 4 26B-A4B
    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Meta
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2026-04-02
    2026-09-02
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+30%
    $0.13
    $0.10
    Output Price+100%
    $0.40
    $0.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.53
    $0.30
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    131.1K
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-01-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    17.2%
    82.3%
    40.0%
    73.8%
    86.3%
    88.3%
    0%
    82.4%
    58.1%
    82.6%
    44.1%
    85.5%

    Verdict

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Gemma 4 26B-A4B's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

    As of September 2, 2026, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is 43% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens ($0.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemma 4 26B-A4B costs $0.13 / $0.40 per million tokens ($0.53 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://dev.meta.ai/docs/pricing-rate-limits/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B Gemini API pricing is $0.13 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Google. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor Meta API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.20 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

    Neither Gemma 4 26B-A4B nor Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B supports a 262K token context window, while Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor supports 1M tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

    Shared benchmark scores for Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor better for production use?

    Both Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 4 26B-A4B through Google and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://dev.meta.ai/docs/pricing-rate-limits/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

    Neither Gemma 4 26B-A4B nor Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 4 26B-A4B costs $0.13/M input and $0.40/M output. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    347 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.