GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Ling-3.0-flash

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K is 17% cheaper per million tokens than Ling-3.0-flash. GLM-4-32B-0414-128K is $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens versus Ling-3.0-flash at $0.06 / $0.18. Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/

    Sources: Z AI pricing (https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing); inclusionAI pricing (https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/)

    Better value

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K

    Z AI

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    128K ctx|Open Source
    17%
    cheaper

    Ling-3.0-flash

    inclusionAI

    $0.24blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.06

    Output

    $0.18

    262.1K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $0.04 per million tokens by choosing GLM-4-32B-0414-128K over Ling-3.0-flash.

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Ling-3.0-flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K
    Ling-3.0-flash
    Provider
    Provider
    Z AI
    inclusionAI
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2025-04-14
    2026-07-23
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+67%
    $0.10
    $0.06
    Output Price-44%
    $0.10
    $0.18
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.20
    $0.24
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    32.8K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    1000 tok/s

    Verdict

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Ling-3.0-flash: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. GLM-4-32B-0414-128K has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Ling-3.0-flash's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Ling-3.0-flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Ling-3.0-flash?

    As of August 20, 2026, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K is 17% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. GLM-4-32B-0414-128K costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06 / $0.18 per million tokens ($0.24 blended). Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Ling-3.0-flash cost per million tokens?

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K Z AI API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via Z AI. Ling-3.0-flash inclusionAI API pricing is $0.06 input and $0.18 output per million tokens via inclusionAI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Ling-3.0-flash?

    Neither GLM-4-32B-0414-128K nor Ling-3.0-flash has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Ling-3.0-flash?

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K supports a 128K token context window, while Ling-3.0-flash supports 262K tokens. Ling-3.0-flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Ling-3.0-flash?

    Shared benchmark scores for GLM-4-32B-0414-128K and Ling-3.0-flash are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Ling-3.0-flash better for production use?

    Both GLM-4-32B-0414-128K and Ling-3.0-flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between GLM-4-32B-0414-128K and Ling-3.0-flash in my app?

    Yes. Call GLM-4-32B-0414-128K through Z AI and Ling-3.0-flash through inclusionAI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Ling-3.0-flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Z AI API pricing and inclusionAI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for GLM-4-32B-0414-128K and Ling-3.0-flash?

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Ling-3.0-flash supports up to 33K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Ling-3.0-flash?

    Ling-3.0-flash has a measured throughput of approximately 1000 tokens/second. Throughput data for GLM-4-32B-0414-128K is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Ling-3.0-flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Ling-3.0-flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Ling-3.0-flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GLM-4-32B-0414-128K costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output. Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    0 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.