GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Qwen3 Max

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3 Max is 94% cheaper per million tokens than GPT-5.6 Cyber. GPT-5.6 Cyber is $12.50 / $75.00 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3 Max at $0.50 / $5.00. Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    GPT-5.6 Cyber

    OpenAI

    $87.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $12.50

    Output

    $75.00

    400K ctx|Proprietary
    94%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3 Max

    Qwen

    $5.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.50

    Output

    $5.00

    256K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $82.00 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3 Max over GPT-5.6 Cyber.

    GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Qwen3 Max comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    GPT-5.6 Cyber
    Qwen3 Max
    Provider
    Provider
    OpenAI
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2026-08-10
    2025-12-15
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+2400%
    $12.50
    $0.50
    Output Price+1400%
    $75.00
    $5.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $87.50
    $5.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    400K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-02-16
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    62%
    72.6%
    67.5%
    81.6%
    55.9%
    15.7%
    87.4%
    91.8%
    84.4%
    65.1%
    74.8%
    73.5%

    Verdict

    GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Qwen3 Max: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Qwen3 Max has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless GPT-5.6 Cyber's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Qwen3 Max FAQ

    Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Cyber or Qwen3 Max?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3 Max is 94% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3 Max costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens ($5.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). GPT-5.6 Cyber costs $12.50 / $75.00 per million tokens ($87.50 blended). Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Qwen3 Max cost per million tokens?

    GPT-5.6 Cyber OpenAI API pricing is $12.50 input and $75.00 output per million tokens via OpenAI. Qwen3 Max Qwen API pricing is $0.50 input and $5.00 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, GPT-5.6 Cyber or Qwen3 Max?

    Qwen3 Max has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 69.6%. GPT-5.6 Cyber does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Qwen3 Max?

    GPT-5.6 Cyber supports a 400K token context window, while Qwen3 Max supports 256K tokens. GPT-5.6 Cyber offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Cyber or Qwen3 Max?

    Shared benchmark scores for GPT-5.6 Cyber and Qwen3 Max are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is GPT-5.6 Cyber or Qwen3 Max better for production use?

    Both GPT-5.6 Cyber and Qwen3 Max are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3 Max has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between GPT-5.6 Cyber and Qwen3 Max in my app?

    Yes. Call GPT-5.6 Cyber through OpenAI and Qwen3 Max through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Qwen3 Max pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenAI API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for GPT-5.6 Cyber and Qwen3 Max?

    GPT-5.6 Cyber supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while Qwen3 Max supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, GPT-5.6 Cyber or Qwen3 Max?

    Neither GPT-5.6 Cyber nor Qwen3 Max has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Qwen3 Max comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GPT-5.6 Cyber or Qwen3 Max from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Qwen3 Max pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GPT-5.6 Cyber costs $12.50/M input and $75.00/M output. Qwen3 Max costs $0.50/M input and $5.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.