K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Ling-3.0-flash

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Ling-3.0-flash is 85% cheaper per million tokens than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is $0.60 / $1.00 per million input/output tokens versus Ling-3.0-flash at $0.06 / $0.18. Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/

    Sources: AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing); inclusionAI pricing (https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/)

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

    LG AI Research

    $1.60blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.60

    Output

    $1.00

    32.8K ctx|Proprietary
    85%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Ling-3.0-flash

    inclusionAI

    $0.24blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.06

    Output

    $0.18

    262.1K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $1.36 per million tokens by choosing Ling-3.0-flash over K-EXAONE-236B-A23B.

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Ling-3.0-flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
    Ling-3.0-flash
    Provider
    Provider
    LG AI Research
    inclusionAI
    License
    Proprietary
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2025-12-31
    2026-07-23
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+900%
    $0.60
    $0.06
    Output Price+456%
    $1.00
    $0.18
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.60
    $0.24
    Model Details
    Context Window
    32.8K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    32.8K
    32.8K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-10-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    50 tok/s
    1000 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    67.3%
    85.7%
    92.8%
    83.8%
    73.2%

    Verdict

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Ling-3.0-flash: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Ling-3.0-flash has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless K-EXAONE-236B-A23B's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Ling-3.0-flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Ling-3.0-flash?

    As of August 20, 2026, Ling-3.0-flash is 85% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens ($0.24 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs $0.60 / $1.00 per million tokens ($1.60 blended). Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Ling-3.0-flash cost per million tokens?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B LG AI Research API pricing is $0.60 input and $1.00 output per million tokens via LG AI Research. Ling-3.0-flash inclusionAI API pricing is $0.06 input and $0.18 output per million tokens via inclusionAI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Ling-3.0-flash?

    Neither K-EXAONE-236B-A23B nor Ling-3.0-flash has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Ling-3.0-flash?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports a 33K token context window, while Ling-3.0-flash supports 262K tokens. Ling-3.0-flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Ling-3.0-flash?

    Shared benchmark scores for K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Ling-3.0-flash are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Ling-3.0-flash better for production use?

    Both K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Ling-3.0-flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Ling-3.0-flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Ling-3.0-flash in my app?

    Yes. Call K-EXAONE-236B-A23B through LG AI Research and Ling-3.0-flash through inclusionAI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Ling-3.0-flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published LG AI Research API pricing and inclusionAI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Ling-3.0-flash?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports up to 33K output tokens per request, while Ling-3.0-flash supports up to 33K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Ling-3.0-flash?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B runs at approximately 50 tokens/second while Ling-3.0-flash runs at 1000 tokens/second. Ling-3.0-flash is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Ling-3.0-flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Ling-3.0-flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Ling-3.0-flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs $0.60/M input and $1.00/M output. Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    0 models

    LG AI Research

    0 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.