Gemma 4 E2B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 50% cheaper per million tokens than Gemma 4 E2B. Gemma 4 E2B is $0.02 / $0.04 per million input/output tokens versus Llama 3.2 3B Instruct at $0.01 / $0.02. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)

    Gemma 4 E2B

    Google

    $0.06blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.02

    Output

    $0.04

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    50%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

    Meta

    $0.03blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.01

    Output

    $0.02

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.03 per million tokens by choosing Llama 3.2 3B Instruct over Gemma 4 E2B.

    Gemma 4 E2B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Gemma 4 E2BLlama 3.2 3B Instruct

    Score vs price

    GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemma 4 E2BLlama 3.2 3B Instruct
    Metric
    Gemma 4 E2B
    Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Meta
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-04-02
    2024-09-25
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+100%
    $0.02
    $0.01
    Output Price+100%
    $0.04
    $0.02
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.06
    $0.03
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131.1K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-01-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    171.5 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    43.4%
    32.8%
    77.4%
    44.2%
    67.4%
    21.9%
    63.4%
    69.8%
    48%
    37.5%
    78.6%
    67%
    77.7%
    52.4%
    23.5%
    58.2%
    60%
    19.1%
    34.3%
    40.1%
    29.4%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 4 E2B 1|0 Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

    Verdict

    Gemma 4 E2B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: the bottom line

    Llama 3.2 3B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while Gemma 4 E2B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Gemma 4 E2B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 E2B or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 50% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.01 per million input tokens and $0.02 per million output tokens ($0.03 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemma 4 E2B costs $0.02 / $0.04 per million tokens ($0.06 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 4 E2B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 4 E2B Gemini API pricing is $0.02 input and $0.04 output per million tokens via Google. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct Meta API pricing is $0.01 input and $0.02 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 E2B or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

    Neither Gemma 4 E2B nor Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for Gemma 4 E2B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

    Gemma 4 E2B supports a 131K token context window, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct supports 128K tokens. Gemma 4 E2B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 4 E2B or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

    Gemma 4 E2B leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 4 E2B or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct better for production use?

    Both Gemma 4 E2B and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 4 E2B and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 4 E2B through Google and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 4 E2B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 4 E2B and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

    Gemma 4 E2B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 4 E2B or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

    Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has a measured throughput of approximately 171.5 tokens/second. Throughput data for Gemma 4 E2B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 4 E2B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 4 E2B or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 4 E2B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 4 E2B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.01/M input and $0.02/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.