MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) is 73% cheaper per million tokens than MAI-Code-1-Flash. MAI-Code-1-Flash is $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens versus Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) at $0.10 / $0.10. Sources: https://azure.microsoft.com/pricing/details/azure-openai-service/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing

    Sources: Microsoft pricing (https://azure.microsoft.com/pricing/details/azure-openai-service/); Mistral pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing)

    MAI-Code-1-Flash

    Microsoft

    $0.75blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.15

    Output

    $0.60

    128K ctx|Proprietary
    73%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

    Mistral

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    32.8K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.55 per million tokens by choosing Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) over MAI-Code-1-Flash.

    MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    MAI-Code-1-Flash
    Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)
    Provider
    Provider
    Microsoft
    Mistral
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-06-02
    2026-08-04
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+50%
    $0.15
    $0.10
    Output Price+500%
    $0.60
    $0.10
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.75
    $0.20
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    32.8K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A

    Verdict

    MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B): the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless MAI-Code-1-Flash's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) FAQ

    Which is cheaper, MAI-Code-1-Flash or Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

    As of August 30, 2026, Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) is 73% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). MAI-Code-1-Flash costs $0.15 / $0.60 per million tokens ($0.75 blended). Sources: https://azure.microsoft.com/pricing/details/azure-openai-service/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) cost per million tokens?

    MAI-Code-1-Flash Microsoft API pricing is $0.15 input and $0.60 output per million tokens via Microsoft. Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) Mistral API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via Mistral. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, MAI-Code-1-Flash or Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

    MAI-Code-1-Flash has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 71.6%. Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

    MAI-Code-1-Flash supports a 128K token context window, while Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) supports 33K tokens. MAI-Code-1-Flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, MAI-Code-1-Flash or Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

    Shared benchmark scores for MAI-Code-1-Flash and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is MAI-Code-1-Flash or Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) better for production use?

    Both MAI-Code-1-Flash and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between MAI-Code-1-Flash and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) in my app?

    Yes. Call MAI-Code-1-Flash through Microsoft and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) through Mistral with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Microsoft API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://azure.microsoft.com/pricing/details/azure-openai-service/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for MAI-Code-1-Flash and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

    MAI-Code-1-Flash supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, MAI-Code-1-Flash or Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

    Neither MAI-Code-1-Flash nor Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open MAI-Code-1-Flash or Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    MAI-Code-1-Flash vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. MAI-Code-1-Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output. Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.