MAI-Thinking-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 60% cheaper per million tokens than MAI-Thinking-1. MAI-Thinking-1 is $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens versus Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) at $0.06 / $0.24. Sources: https://azure.microsoft.com/pricing/details/azure-openai-service/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: Microsoft pricing (https://azure.microsoft.com/pricing/details/azure-openai-service/); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    MAI-Thinking-1

    Microsoft

    $0.75blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.15

    Output

    $0.60

    128K ctx|Proprietary
    60%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

    NVIDIA

    $0.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.06

    Output

    $0.24

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.45 per million tokens by choosing Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) over MAI-Thinking-1.

    MAI-Thinking-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    SWE-bench Verified. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceMAI-Thinking-1Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
    Metric
    MAI-Thinking-1
    Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
    Provider
    Provider
    Microsoft
    NVIDIA
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-06-02
    2025-12-15
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+150%
    $0.15
    $0.06
    Output Price+150%
    $0.60
    $0.24
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.75
    $0.30
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    262.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2025-11-28
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmark Wins
    MAI-Thinking-1 5|1 Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

    Verdict

    MAI-Thinking-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B): the bottom line

    Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) offers significantly lower pricing, while MAI-Thinking-1 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    MAI-Thinking-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) FAQ

    Which is cheaper, MAI-Thinking-1 or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

    As of August 30, 2026, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 60% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens ($0.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). MAI-Thinking-1 costs $0.15 / $0.60 per million tokens ($0.75 blended). Sources: https://azure.microsoft.com/pricing/details/azure-openai-service/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does MAI-Thinking-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) cost per million tokens?

    MAI-Thinking-1 Microsoft API pricing is $0.15 input and $0.60 output per million tokens via Microsoft. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) NVIDIA API pricing is $0.06 input and $0.24 output per million tokens via NVIDIA. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, MAI-Thinking-1 or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

    MAI-Thinking-1 leads on SWE-bench Verified: MAI-Thinking-1 at 73.5% vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) at 38.8%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for MAI-Thinking-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

    MAI-Thinking-1 supports a 128K token context window, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, MAI-Thinking-1 or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

    MAI-Thinking-1 leads on 5 of 6 shared benchmarks versus Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is MAI-Thinking-1 or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) better for production use?

    Both MAI-Thinking-1 and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between MAI-Thinking-1 and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) in my app?

    Yes. Call MAI-Thinking-1 through Microsoft and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) through NVIDIA with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this MAI-Thinking-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Microsoft API pricing and NVIDIA API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://azure.microsoft.com/pricing/details/azure-openai-service/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for MAI-Thinking-1 and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

    MAI-Thinking-1 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports up to 262K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, MAI-Thinking-1 or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

    Neither MAI-Thinking-1 nor Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this MAI-Thinking-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open MAI-Thinking-1 or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    MAI-Thinking-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. MAI-Thinking-1 costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs $0.06/M input and $0.24/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.