Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 21, 2026, Llama 4 Maverick is 38% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct. Llama 4 Maverick is $0.17 / $0.85 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct at $0.15 / $1.50. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Better value

    Llama 4 Maverick

    Meta

    $1.02blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.17

    Output

    $0.85

    1M ctx|Open Source
    38%
    cheaper

    Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

    Qwen

    $1.65blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.15

    Output

    $1.50

    65.5K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.63 per million tokens by choosing Llama 4 Maverick over Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Llama 4 Maverick
    Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Meta
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-04-05
    2025-09-10
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+13%
    $0.17
    $0.15
    Output Price-43%
    $0.85
    $1.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.02
    $1.65
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    65.5K
    Max Output Tokens
    1M
    65.5K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    69.42 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    5.7%
    69.8%
    72.9%
    69.8%
    33.1%
    87.6%
    59.6%
    53.6%
    69.5%
    15.6%
    49.8%
    85.5%
    73.4%
    61.2%
    70.3%
    90%
    0%
    94.4%
    54.1%
    78.9%
    73.7%
    77.6%
    92.3%
    80.5%
    80.6%
    76.7%
    90.9%
    75.8%
    87.8%
    45.9%
    58.8%
    31.7%
    87.3%
    Benchmark Wins
    Llama 4 Maverick 0|3 Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

    Verdict

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct: the bottom line

    Llama 4 Maverick offers significantly lower pricing, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

    As of August 21, 2026, Llama 4 Maverick is 38% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17 per million input tokens and $0.85 per million output tokens ($1.02 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct costs $0.15 / $1.50 per million tokens ($1.65 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Llama 4 Maverick Meta API pricing is $0.17 input and $0.85 output per million tokens via Meta. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct Qwen API pricing is $0.15 input and $1.50 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

    Llama 4 Maverick has a published LiveCodeBench score of 43.4%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

    Llama 4 Maverick supports a 1M token context window, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct supports 66K tokens. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

    Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Llama 4 Maverick's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct better for production use?

    Both Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 4 Maverick has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Llama 4 Maverick through Meta and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

    Llama 4 Maverick supports up to 1M output tokens per request, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct supports up to 66K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

    Llama 4 Maverick has a measured throughput of approximately 69.42 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17/M input and $0.85/M output. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct costs $0.15/M input and $1.50/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.