Pixtral Large vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

    Comparison

    As of August 21, 2026, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 51% cheaper per million tokens than Pixtral Large. Pixtral Large is $2.00 / $6.00 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at $0.45 / $3.49. Sources: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Pixtral Large

    Mistral

    $8.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $2.00

    Output

    $6.00

    128K ctx|Open Source
    51%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

    Qwen

    $3.94blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.45

    Output

    $3.49

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $4.06 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking over Pixtral Large.

    Pixtral Large vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Pixtral Large
    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
    Provider
    Provider
    Mistral
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-11-18
    2025-09-22
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+344%
    $2.00
    $0.45
    Output Price+72%
    $6.00
    $3.49
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $8.00
    $3.94
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    262.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    0.1 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    13.6%
    44.4%
    88.2%
    38.1%
    69.3%
    66.1%
    89.7%
    90.6%
    64%
    93.8%
    89.2%
    53.7%
    71.9%
    67.1%
    81.5%
    63.5%
    88.1%
    93.7%
    93.4%
    93.3%
    96.5%
    52.5%
    77.4%
    11%
    80%
    89.5%
    63.6%
    74.6%
    69.4%
    92.7%
    83.8%
    90.6%
    83.8%
    80.6%
    93.7%
    80.6%
    78.7%
    80.1%
    79.1%
    71.2%
    87.5%
    43.2%
    68.3%
    81.3%
    92.4%
    95.4%
    77.3%
    61.3%
    34.9%
    64.3%
    80%
    34.4%
    80.9%
    86.7%
    97.3%
    Benchmark Wins
    Pixtral Large 2|0 Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

    Verdict

    Pixtral Large vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: the bottom line

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking offers significantly lower pricing, while Pixtral Large leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Pixtral Large vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

    As of August 21, 2026, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 51% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $3.49 per million output tokens ($3.94 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Pixtral Large costs $2.00 / $6.00 per million tokens ($8.00 blended). Sources: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Pixtral Large vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking cost per million tokens?

    Pixtral Large Mistral API pricing is $2.00 input and $6.00 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking Qwen API pricing is $0.45 input and $3.49 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Pixtral Large or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

    Neither Pixtral Large nor Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for Pixtral Large vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

    Pixtral Large supports a 128K token context window, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports 262K tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Pixtral Large or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

    Pixtral Large leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Pixtral Large or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking better for production use?

    Both Pixtral Large and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Pixtral Large and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking in my app?

    Yes. Call Pixtral Large through Mistral AI and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Pixtral Large vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Mistral API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Pixtral Large and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

    Pixtral Large supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports up to 262K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Pixtral Large or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

    Pixtral Large has a measured throughput of approximately 0.1 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Pixtral Large vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Pixtral Large or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Pixtral Large vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Pixtral Large costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via Mistral AI. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $0.45/M input and $3.49/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.