Compare $ / Video, Text to Video, Image to Video, license, and release date. Search any video generation model with the pickers below.
WAN 2.7
Wan Video
$0.20
WAN Video 2.6
Wan Video
$0.36
WAN 2.7 currently shows the lower $ / Video: $0.20 vs $0.36 for WAN Video 2.6. That is the public Wan Video video API pricing versus Wan Video video API pricing. Duration, resolution, and voice settings can still flip the invoice.
WAN 2.7 currently leads on Text to Video: 1.2K for WAN 2.7 vs 568 for WAN Video 2.6. Rank and price move independently, so the cheaper video generation model is not automatically the weaker one.
Yes. WAN 2.7 scores 1.5K and WAN Video 2.6 scores N/A on Image to Video. If one side is N/A, that mode is missing from the public feed, not priced at zero.
WAN 2.7 is open source (Apache 2.0). WAN Video 2.6 is open source (Apache 2.0). Open-weight models can be self-hosted; proprietary ones are billed only through the provider API on this page.
Use the model pickers at the top of this page. Search any video generation model in the index and the URL updates to a new comparison, the same way LLM comparison pages work. Open either model from the sidebar for the single-model $ / Video page.
This comparison uses public llm-stats and ZeroEval arena data for video generation models, then normalizes $ / Video, Text to Video, Image to Video, license, and release date inside AnotherWrapper. Treat the numbers as comparable public list rates, not a quote from either vendor.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
