Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 96% cheaper per million tokens than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $0.80 / $4.00 per million input/output tokens versus Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) at $0.10 / $0.10. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    Claude 3.5 Haiku

    Anthropic

    $4.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.80

    Output

    $4.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    96%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

    Mistral

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $4.60 per million tokens by choosing Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) over Claude 3.5 Haiku.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Claude 3.5 HaikuMin istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

    Score vs price

    AIME 2025. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceClaude 3.5 HaikuMin istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
    Metric
    Claude 3.5 Haiku
    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Mistral
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-10-22
    2025-12-04
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+700%
    $0.80
    $0.10
    Output Price+3900%
    $4.00
    $0.10
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $4.80
    $0.20
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    200K
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    104 tok/s
    1222 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    41.6%
    53.4%
    38.1%
    41.9%
    54.8%
    27.4%
    6.7%
    4.3%
    72.1%
    77.5%
    64.2%
    74.3%
    88.1%
    69.4%
    50.8%
    0%
    83.1%
    43.5%
    85.6%
    65%
    57.4%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude 3.5 Haiku 0|3 Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

    Verdict

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512): the bottom line

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    As of August 25, 2026, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 96% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80 / $4.00 per million tokens ($4.80 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) cost per million tokens?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $0.80 input and $4.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) Mistral API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 40.6%. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku supports a 200K token context window, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Claude 3.5 Haiku's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) better for production use?

    Both Claude 3.5 Haiku and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude 3.5 Haiku through Anthropic and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku supports up to 200K output tokens per request, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku runs at approximately 104 tokens/second while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) runs at 1222 tokens/second. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude 3.5 Haiku or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.