Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Mistral NeMo Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Mistral NeMo Instruct is 100% cheaper per million tokens than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is $20.00 / $40.00 per million input/output tokens versus Mistral NeMo Instruct at $0.15 / $0.15. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

    Google

    $60.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $20.00

    Output

    $40.00

    32K ctx|Proprietary
    100%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Mistral NeMo Instruct

    Mistral

    $0.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.15

    Output

    $0.15

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $59.70 per million tokens by choosing Mistral NeMo Instruct over Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Mistral NeMo Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Gemma 3n E4B InstructedMistral NeMo Instruct

    Score vs price

    MMLU. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemma 3n E4B InstructedMistral NeMo Instruct
    Metric
    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
    Mistral NeMo Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Mistral
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-06-26
    2024-07-18
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+13233%
    $20.00
    $0.15
    Output Price+26567%
    $40.00
    $0.15
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $60.00
    $0.30
    Model Details
    Context Window
    32K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    32K
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2024-06-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    42.1 tok/s
    42 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    23.7%
    11.6%
    64.9%
    68%
    83.5%
    75%
    19%
    60.3%
    37.7%
    57.2%
    63.6%
    67%
    50.6%
    19.9%
    35.6%
    60.6%
    73.8%
    50.3%
    76.8%
    50.1%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed 0|1 Mistral NeMo Instruct

    Verdict

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Mistral NeMo Instruct: the bottom line

    Mistral NeMo Instruct offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Mistral NeMo Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    As of August 25, 2026, Mistral NeMo Instruct is 100% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Mistral NeMo Instruct costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens ($0.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00 / $40.00 per million tokens ($60.00 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Mistral NeMo Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed Gemini API pricing is $20.00 input and $40.00 output per million tokens via Google. Mistral NeMo Instruct Mistral API pricing is $0.15 input and $0.15 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a published LiveCodeBench score of 13.2%. Mistral NeMo Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports a 32K token context window, while Mistral NeMo Instruct supports 128K tokens. Mistral NeMo Instruct offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    Mistral NeMo Instruct leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or Mistral NeMo Instruct better for production use?

    Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Mistral NeMo Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Mistral NeMo Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Mistral NeMo Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 3n E4B Instructed through Google and Mistral NeMo Instruct through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Mistral NeMo Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports up to 32K output tokens per request, while Mistral NeMo Instruct supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed runs at approximately 42.1 tokens/second while Mistral NeMo Instruct runs at 42 tokens/second. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Mistral NeMo Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or Mistral NeMo Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Mistral NeMo Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output. Mistral NeMo Instruct costs $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.