Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Llama 4 Scout

Comparison

As of August 25, 2026, Llama 4 Scout is 28% cheaper per million tokens than Gemma 4 26B-A4B. Gemma 4 26B-A4B is $0.13 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens versus Llama 4 Scout at $0.08 / $0.30. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/

Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)

Gemma 4 26B-A4B

Google

$0.53blended / 1M

Input

$0.13

Output

$0.40

262.1K ctx|Open Source

28%

cheaper

Better value

Llama 4 Scout

Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Llama 4 Scout comparison

Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

Shared benchmarks

Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

Gemma 4 26B-A4BLlama 4 Scout

Score vs price

GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

Best score at each priceGemma 4 26B-A4BLlama 4 Scout

Metric

Gemma 4 26B-A4B

Llama 4 Scout

Provider

Google

Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Llama 4 Scout: the bottom line

Llama 4 Scout offers significantly lower pricing, while Gemma 4 26B-A4B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

View Gemma 4 26B-A4B details View Llama 4 Scout details

Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Llama 4 Scout?

As of August 25, 2026, Llama 4 Scout is 28% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens ($0.38 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemma 4 26B-A4B costs $0.13 / $0.40 per million tokens ($0.53 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

How much does Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Llama 4 Scout cost per million tokens?

Gemma 4 26B-A4B Gemini API pricing is $0.13 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Google. Llama 4 Scout Meta API pricing is $0.08 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a published LiveCodeBench score of 32.8%. Gemma 4 26B-A4B does not have that eval on this page yet.

What is the context window for Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Llama 4 Scout?

Gemma 4 26B-A4B supports a 262K token context window, while Llama 4 Scout supports 10M tokens. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Llama 4 Scout?

Gemma 4 26B-A4B leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Llama 4 Scout's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

Is Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Llama 4 Scout better for production use?

Both Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Llama 4 Scout are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 4 Scout has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

Can I switch between Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Llama 4 Scout in my app?

Yes. Call Gemma 4 26B-A4B through Google and Llama 4 Scout through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

How accurate is this Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Llama 4 Scout pricing data?

List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

What is the output token limit for Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Llama 4 Scout?

Gemma 4 26B-A4B supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Llama 4 Scout supports up to 10M output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

Which model has better throughput, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a measured throughput of approximately 76.1 tokens/second. Throughput data for Gemma 4 26B-A4B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

How do I switch the models in this Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Llama 4 Scout comparison?

Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Llama 4 Scout from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Llama 4 Scout pricing

This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 4 26B-A4B costs $0.13/M input and $0.40/M output. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output.

Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.