Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
As of August 25, 2026, Gemma 4 31B is 10% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.54 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs $0.30 / $0.30 per million tokens ($0.60 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.
How much does Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct cost per million tokens?
Gemma 4 31B Gemini API pricing is $0.14 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Google. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Qwen API pricing is $0.30 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.
Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a published LiveCodeBench score of 28.7%. Gemma 4 31B does not have that eval on this page yet.
What is the context window for Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Gemma 4 31B supports a 262K token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. Gemma 4 31B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.
Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Gemma 4 31B leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.
Is Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for production use?
Both Gemma 4 31B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 4 31B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.
Can I switch between Gemma 4 31B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in my app?
Yes. Call Gemma 4 31B through Google and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.
How accurate is this Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct pricing data?
List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.
What is the output token limit for Gemma 4 31B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Gemma 4 31B supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports up to 8K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.
Which model has better throughput, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Gemma 4 31B runs at approximately 1.2 tokens/second while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct runs at 138 tokens/second. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.
How do I switch the models in this Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct comparison?
Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.
