GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K is 67% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. GLM-4-32B-0414-128K is $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen2.5 7B Instruct at $0.30 / $0.30. Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: Z AI pricing (https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Better value

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K

    Z AI

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    128K ctx|Open Source
    67%
    cheaper

    Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

    Qwen

    $0.60blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $0.30

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.40 per million tokens by choosing GLM-4-32B-0414-128K over Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K
    Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Z AI
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-04-14
    2024-09-19
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-67%
    $0.10
    $0.30
    Output Price-67%
    $0.10
    $0.30
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.20
    $0.60
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    8.2K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    138 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    36.4%
    71.2%
    72.9%
    84.8%
    75.5%
    73.3%
    91.6%
    35.9%
    79.2%
    56.3%
    75.4%
    87.5%
    70.4%

    Verdict

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. GLM-4-32B-0414-128K has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

    As of August 25, 2026, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K is 67% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. GLM-4-32B-0414-128K costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs $0.30 / $0.30 per million tokens ($0.60 blended). Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K Z AI API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via Z AI. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Qwen API pricing is $0.30 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

    Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a published LiveCodeBench score of 28.7%. GLM-4-32B-0414-128K does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K supports a 128K token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

    Shared benchmark scores for GLM-4-32B-0414-128K and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for production use?

    Both GLM-4-32B-0414-128K and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between GLM-4-32B-0414-128K and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call GLM-4-32B-0414-128K through Z AI and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Z AI API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for GLM-4-32B-0414-128K and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports up to 8K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

    Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a measured throughput of approximately 138 tokens/second. Throughput data for GLM-4-32B-0414-128K is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GLM-4-32B-0414-128K or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    GLM-4-32B-0414-128K vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GLM-4-32B-0414-128K costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $0.30/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.