GLM-4.5-Air vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 85% cheaper per million tokens than GLM-4.5-Air. GLM-4.5-Air is $0.20 / $1.10 per million input/output tokens versus Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) at $0.10 / $0.10. Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: Z AI pricing (https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    GLM-4.5-Air

    Z AI

    $1.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $1.10

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    85%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

    Mistral

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.10 per million tokens by choosing Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) over GLM-4.5-Air.

    GLM-4.5-Air vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    GLM-4.5-AirMin istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

    Score vs price

    GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGLM-4.5-AirMin istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
    Metric
    GLM-4.5-Air
    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
    Provider
    Provider
    Z AI
    Mistral
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-07-28
    2025-12-04
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+100%
    $0.20
    $0.10
    Output Price+1000%
    $1.10
    $0.10
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.30
    $0.20
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131.1K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    1222 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    10.6%
    75%
    53.4%
    70.7%
    54.8%
    37.3%
    21.3%
    72.1%
    89.4%
    77.5%
    98.1%
    64.8%
    76.4%
    81.4%
    Benchmark Wins
    GLM-4.5-Air 3|0 Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

    Verdict

    GLM-4.5-Air vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512): the bottom line

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) offers significantly lower pricing, while GLM-4.5-Air leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    GLM-4.5-Air vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) FAQ

    Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5-Air or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    As of August 25, 2026, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 85% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). GLM-4.5-Air costs $0.20 / $1.10 per million tokens ($1.30 blended). Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does GLM-4.5-Air vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) cost per million tokens?

    GLM-4.5-Air Z AI API pricing is $0.20 input and $1.10 output per million tokens via Z AI. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) Mistral API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, GLM-4.5-Air or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    GLM-4.5-Air has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 57.6%. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for GLM-4.5-Air vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    GLM-4.5-Air supports a 131K token context window, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, GLM-4.5-Air or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    GLM-4.5-Air leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is GLM-4.5-Air or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) better for production use?

    Both GLM-4.5-Air and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between GLM-4.5-Air and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) in my app?

    Yes. Call GLM-4.5-Air through Z AI and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this GLM-4.5-Air vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Z AI API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for GLM-4.5-Air and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    GLM-4.5-Air supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, GLM-4.5-Air or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) has a measured throughput of approximately 1222 tokens/second. Throughput data for GLM-4.5-Air is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this GLM-4.5-Air vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GLM-4.5-Air or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    GLM-4.5-Air vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GLM-4.5-Air costs $0.20/M input and $1.10/M output. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.