GPT-4 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is 98% cheaper per million tokens than GPT-4 Turbo. GPT-4 Turbo is $10.00 / $30.00 per million input/output tokens versus Granite 3.3 8B Instruct at $0.50 / $0.50. Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    GPT-4 Turbo

    OpenAI

    $40.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $10.00

    Output

    $30.00

    128K ctx|Proprietary
    98%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

    IBM

    $1.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.50

    Output

    $0.50

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $39.00 per million tokens by choosing Granite 3.3 8B Instruct over GPT-4 Turbo.

    GPT-4 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    GPT-4 TurboGranite 3.3 8B Instruct

    Score vs price

    MMLU. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGPT-4 TurboGranite 3.3 8B Instruct
    Metric
    GPT-4 Turbo
    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    OpenAI
    IBM
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-04-09
    2025-04-16
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+1900%
    $10.00
    $0.50
    Output Price+5900%
    $30.00
    $0.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $40.00
    $1.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    4.1K
    8.2K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2023-12-31
    2024-04-01
    Throughput
    100 tok/s
    50 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    48%
    46.6%
    74.8%
    6.7%
    81.2%
    69.0%
    86.5%
    65.5%
    87.1%
    89.7%
    72.6%
    57.6%
    88.5%
    86%
    59.4%
    80.9%
    82.0%
    88.5%
    26.2%
    25.1%
    66.9%
    Benchmark Wins
    GPT-4 Turbo 2|1 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

    Verdict

    GPT-4 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct: the bottom line

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while GPT-4 Turbo leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    GPT-4 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

    As of August 25, 2026, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is 98% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens ($1.00 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00 / $30.00 per million tokens ($40.00 blended). Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does GPT-4 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI API pricing is $10.00 input and $30.00 output per million tokens via OpenAI. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct IBM API pricing is $0.50 input and $0.50 output per million tokens via IBM. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, GPT-4 Turbo or Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads on HumanEval: GPT-4 Turbo at 87.1% vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct at 89.7%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for GPT-4 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

    GPT-4 Turbo supports a 128K token context window, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens. Both models have the same context window size. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, GPT-4 Turbo or Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

    GPT-4 Turbo leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is GPT-4 Turbo or Granite 3.3 8B Instruct better for production use?

    Both GPT-4 Turbo and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between GPT-4 Turbo and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call GPT-4 Turbo through OpenAI and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct through IBM with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this GPT-4 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenAI API pricing and IBM API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for GPT-4 Turbo and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

    GPT-4 Turbo supports up to 4K output tokens per request, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports up to 8K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, GPT-4 Turbo or Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

    GPT-4 Turbo runs at approximately 100 tokens/second while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct runs at 50 tokens/second. GPT-4 Turbo is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this GPT-4 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GPT-4 Turbo or Granite 3.3 8B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    GPT-4 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00/M input and $30.00/M output. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs $0.50/M input and $0.50/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    IBM

    0 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.