Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Llama 4 Scout is 62% cheaper per million tokens than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is $0.50 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens versus Llama 4 Scout at $0.08 / $0.30. Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://llama.meta.com/

    Sources: AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

    IBM

    $1.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.50

    Output

    $0.50

    128K ctx|Open Source
    62%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Llama 4 Scout

    Meta

    $0.38blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.08

    Output

    $0.30

    10M ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.62 per million tokens by choosing Llama 4 Scout over Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Granite 3.3 8B InstructLlama 4 Scout

    Score vs price

    MMLU. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGranite 3.3 8B InstructLlama 4 Scout
    Metric
    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
    Llama 4 Scout
    Provider
    Provider
    IBM
    Meta
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-04-16
    2025-04-05
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+525%
    $0.50
    $0.08
    Output Price+67%
    $0.50
    $0.30
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.00
    $0.38
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    10M
    Max Output Tokens
    8.2K
    10M
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2024-04-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    50 tok/s
    76.1 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    57.2%
    57.2%
    17.0%
    74.8%
    81.2%
    69.0%
    65.5%
    79.6%
    69.4%
    89.7%
    50.3%
    57.6%
    88.5%
    88.8%
    0%
    94.4%
    59.4%
    80.9%
    70.7%
    67.8%
    90.6%
    74.3%
    26.2%
    66.9%
    31.5%
    Benchmark Wins
    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 0|1 Llama 4 Scout

    Verdict

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout: the bottom line

    Llama 4 Scout offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout?

    As of August 25, 2026, Llama 4 Scout is 62% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens ($0.38 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs $0.50 / $0.50 per million tokens ($1.00 blended). Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout cost per million tokens?

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct IBM API pricing is $0.50 input and $0.50 output per million tokens via IBM. Llama 4 Scout Meta API pricing is $0.08 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout?

    Llama 4 Scout has a published LiveCodeBench score of 32.8%. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout?

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports a 128K token context window, while Llama 4 Scout supports 10M tokens. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout?

    Llama 4 Scout leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout better for production use?

    Both Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Llama 4 Scout are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 4 Scout has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Llama 4 Scout in my app?

    Yes. Call Granite 3.3 8B Instruct through IBM and Llama 4 Scout through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published IBM API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct and Llama 4 Scout?

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports up to 8K output tokens per request, while Llama 4 Scout supports up to 10M output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout?

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct runs at approximately 50 tokens/second while Llama 4 Scout runs at 76.1 tokens/second. Llama 4 Scout is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Llama 4 Scout from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs $0.50/M input and $0.50/M output. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    IBM

    0 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.