Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Gemma 3 27B is 57% cheaper per million tokens than Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning. Gemma 3 27B is $0.10 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens versus Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning at $0.20 / $0.50. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://docs.x.ai/docs/models

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); xAI API pricing (https://docs.x.ai/docs/models)

    Better value

    Gemma 3 27B

    Google

    $0.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.20

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    57%
    cheaper

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

    xAI

    $0.70blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $0.50

    2M ctx|Proprietary
    Save $0.40 per million tokens by choosing Gemma 3 27B over Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning.

    Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    BFCL. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemma 3 27BGrok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
    Metric
    Gemma 3 27B
    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    xAI
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2025-03-12
    2025-11-17
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-50%
    $0.10
    $0.20
    Output Price-60%
    $0.20
    $0.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.30
    $0.70
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131.1K
    2M
    Max Output Tokens
    131.1K
    30K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    33 tok/s
    90 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    42.4%
    43.9%
    65.2%
    29.7%
    42.6%
    21.2%
    10%
    90.4%
    22.2%
    27.1%
    29.5%
    58.3%
    63.7%
    87.8%
    89%
    84.5%
    54.4%
    78%
    52.5%
    0%
    86.6%
    16.7%
    95.9%
    60.3%
    70.6%
    7.7%
    50.0%
    74.4%
    28.4%
    76.0%
    77.5%
    87.6%
    67.5%
    75.2%
    64.9%
    13.5%
    84.5%
    11.9%
    61.9%
    65.1%
    71%
    53.4%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 3 27B 0|5 Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

    Verdict

    Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning: the bottom line

    Gemma 3 27B offers significantly lower pricing, while Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning?

    As of August 25, 2026, Gemma 3 27B is 57% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens ($0.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning costs $0.20 / $0.50 per million tokens ($0.70 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://docs.x.ai/docs/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 3 27B Gemini API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.20 output per million tokens via Google. Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning xAI API pricing is $0.20 input and $0.50 output per million tokens via xAI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 3 27B or Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning?

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning leads on LiveCodeBench: Gemma 3 27B at 29.7% vs Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning at 42.6%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning?

    Gemma 3 27B supports a 131K token context window, while Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning supports 2M tokens. Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 3 27B or Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning?

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 3 27B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 3 27B or Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning better for production use?

    Both Gemma 3 27B and Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 3 27B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 3 27B and Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 3 27B through Google and Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning through xAI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and xAI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://docs.x.ai/docs/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 3 27B and Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning?

    Gemma 3 27B supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning supports up to 30K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 3 27B or Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning?

    Gemma 3 27B runs at approximately 33 tokens/second while Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning runs at 90 tokens/second. Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 3 27B or Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output. Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning costs $0.20/M input and $0.50/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.