GLM-4.7-Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, GLM-4.7-Flash is 100% cheaper per million tokens than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B. GLM-4.7-Flash is $0.00 / $0.00 per million input/output tokens versus K-EXAONE-236B-A23B at $0.60 / $1.00. Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: Z AI pricing (https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    Better value

    GLM-4.7-Flash

    Z AI

    $0.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.00

    Output

    $0.00

    202.8K ctx|Open Source
    100%
    cheaper

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

    LG AI Research

    $1.60blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.60

    Output

    $1.00

    32.8K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $1.60 per million tokens by choosing GLM-4.7-Flash over K-EXAONE-236B-A23B.

    GLM-4.7-Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    GLM-4.7-FlashK-EXAONE-236B-A23B

    Score vs price

    AIME 2025. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGLM-4.7-FlashK-EXAONE-236B-A23B
    Metric
    GLM-4.7-Flash
    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
    Provider
    Provider
    Z AI
    LG AI Research
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2026-01-19
    2025-12-31
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-100%
    $0.00
    $0.60
    Output Price-100%
    $0.00
    $1.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.00
    $1.60
    Model Details
    Context Window
    202.8K
    32.8K
    Max Output Tokens
    16.4K
    32.8K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2025-10-01
    Throughput
    50 tok/s
    50 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    14.4%
    75.2%
    42.8%
    67.3%
    85.7%
    91.6%
    92.8%
    83.8%
    73.2%
    79.5%
    Benchmark Wins
    GLM-4.7-Flash 0|1 K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

    Verdict

    GLM-4.7-Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B: the bottom line

    GLM-4.7-Flash offers significantly lower pricing, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    GLM-4.7-Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?

    As of August 25, 2026, GLM-4.7-Flash is 100% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. GLM-4.7-Flash costs $0.00 per million input tokens and $0.00 per million output tokens ($0.00 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs $0.60 / $1.00 per million tokens ($1.60 blended). Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does GLM-4.7-Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B cost per million tokens?

    GLM-4.7-Flash Z AI API pricing is $0.00 input and $0.00 output per million tokens via Z AI. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B LG AI Research API pricing is $0.60 input and $1.00 output per million tokens via LG AI Research. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7-Flash or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?

    GLM-4.7-Flash has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 59.2%. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for GLM-4.7-Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?

    GLM-4.7-Flash supports a 203K token context window, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports 33K tokens. GLM-4.7-Flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, GLM-4.7-Flash or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus GLM-4.7-Flash's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is GLM-4.7-Flash or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B better for production use?

    Both GLM-4.7-Flash and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, GLM-4.7-Flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between GLM-4.7-Flash and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B in my app?

    Yes. Call GLM-4.7-Flash through Z AI and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B through LG AI Research with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this GLM-4.7-Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Z AI API pricing and LG AI Research API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for GLM-4.7-Flash and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?

    GLM-4.7-Flash supports up to 16K output tokens per request, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports up to 33K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, GLM-4.7-Flash or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?

    GLM-4.7-Flash runs at approximately 50 tokens/second while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B runs at 50 tokens/second. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this GLM-4.7-Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GLM-4.7-Flash or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    GLM-4.7-Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GLM-4.7-Flash costs $0.00/M input and $0.00/M output. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs $0.60/M input and $1.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    0 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.