K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Phi 4 Mini

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Phi 4 Mini is 73% cheaper per million tokens than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is $0.60 / $1.00 per million input/output tokens versus Phi 4 Mini at $0.08 / $0.35. Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Sources: AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

    LG AI Research

    $1.60blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.60

    Output

    $1.00

    32.8K ctx|Proprietary
    73%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Phi 4 Mini

    Microsoft

    $0.43blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.08

    Output

    $0.35

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.17 per million tokens by choosing Phi 4 Mini over K-EXAONE-236B-A23B.

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Phi 4 Mini comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23BPhi 4 Mini

    Score vs price

    MMLU-Pro. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceK-EXAONE-236B-A23BPhi 4 Mini
    Metric
    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
    Phi 4 Mini
    Provider
    Provider
    LG AI Research
    Microsoft
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-12-31
    2025-02-01
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+650%
    $0.60
    $0.08
    Output Price+186%
    $1.00
    $0.35
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.60
    $0.43
    Model Details
    Context Window
    32.8K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    32.8K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-10-01
    2024-06-01
    Throughput
    50 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    25.2%
    67.3%
    85.7%
    92.8%
    67.3%
    69.1%
    64%
    83.7%
    32.8%
    81.2%
    88.6%
    63.9%
    83.8%
    52.8%
    79.2%
    77.6%
    72.5%
    73.2%
    66.4%
    Benchmark Wins
    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B 1|0 Phi 4 Mini

    Verdict

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Phi 4 Mini: the bottom line

    Phi 4 Mini offers significantly lower pricing, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Phi 4 Mini FAQ

    Which is cheaper, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Phi 4 Mini?

    As of August 25, 2026, Phi 4 Mini is 73% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Phi 4 Mini costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.35 per million output tokens ($0.43 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs $0.60 / $1.00 per million tokens ($1.60 blended). Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Phi 4 Mini cost per million tokens?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B LG AI Research API pricing is $0.60 input and $1.00 output per million tokens via LG AI Research. Phi 4 Mini OpenRouter API pricing is $0.08 input and $0.35 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Phi 4 Mini?

    Neither K-EXAONE-236B-A23B nor Phi 4 Mini has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Phi 4 Mini?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports a 33K token context window, while Phi 4 Mini supports 131K tokens. Phi 4 Mini offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Phi 4 Mini?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Phi 4 Mini's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Phi 4 Mini better for production use?

    Both K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Phi 4 Mini are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Phi 4 Mini has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Phi 4 Mini in my app?

    Yes. Call K-EXAONE-236B-A23B through LG AI Research and Phi 4 Mini through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Phi 4 Mini pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published LG AI Research API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Phi 4 Mini?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports up to 33K output tokens per request, while Phi 4 Mini supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Phi 4 Mini?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B has a measured throughput of approximately 50 tokens/second. Throughput data for Phi 4 Mini is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Phi 4 Mini comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or Phi 4 Mini from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Phi 4 Mini pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs $0.60/M input and $1.00/M output. Phi 4 Mini costs $0.08/M input and $0.35/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    0 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.