Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is 75% cheaper per million tokens than MiMo-V2-Flash. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is $0.05 / $0.05 per million input/output tokens versus MiMo-V2-Flash at $0.10 / $0.30. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    Better value

    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

    Meta

    $0.10blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.05

    Output

    $0.05

    128K ctx|Open Source
    75%
    cheaper

    MiMo-V2-Flash

    Xiaomi

    $0.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.30

    256K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.30 per million tokens by choosing Llama 3.2 11B Instruct over MiMo-V2-Flash.

    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Llama 3.2 11B InstructMiMo-V2-Flash

    Score vs price

    GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceLlama 3.2 11B InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
    Metric
    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
    MiMo-V2-Flash
    Provider
    Provider
    Meta
    Xiaomi
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-09-25
    2025-12-16
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-50%
    $0.05
    $0.10
    Output Price-83%
    $0.05
    $0.30
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.10
    $0.40
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    16.4K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2023-12-31
    N/A
    Throughput
    108 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    22.1%
    32.8%
    83.7%
    59.3%
    25.9%
    1336.80
    58.3%
    33%
    94.1%
    73%
    50.7%
    51.9%
    91.1%
    83.4%
    0%
    88.4%
    84.4%
    60.6%
    51.5%
    68.9%
    84.9%
    45.7%
    80.3%
    75.2%
    Benchmark Wins
    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct 0|1 MiMo-V2-Flash

    Verdict

    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash: the bottom line

    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while MiMo-V2-Flash leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash?

    As of August 25, 2026, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is 75% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.05 per million output tokens ($0.10 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10 / $0.30 per million tokens ($0.40 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash cost per million tokens?

    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct Meta API pricing is $0.05 input and $0.05 output per million tokens via Meta. MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Xiaomi. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash?

    MiMo-V2-Flash has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 73.4%. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash?

    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports a 128K token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash?

    MiMo-V2-Flash leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Llama 3.2 11B Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash better for production use?

    Both Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and MiMo-V2-Flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and MiMo-V2-Flash in my app?

    Yes. Call Llama 3.2 11B Instruct through Meta and MiMo-V2-Flash through Xiaomi with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and Xiaomi API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and MiMo-V2-Flash?

    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while MiMo-V2-Flash supports up to 16K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash?

    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a measured throughput of approximately 108 tokens/second. Throughput data for MiMo-V2-Flash is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Llama 3.2 11B Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct costs $0.05/M input and $0.05/M output. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.