Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

    Comparison

    As of August 26, 2026, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is 61% cheaper per million tokens than Llama 4 Maverick. Llama 4 Maverick is $0.17 / $0.85 per million input/output tokens versus Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base at $0.10 / $0.30. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    Llama 4 Maverick

    Meta

    $1.02blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.17

    Output

    $0.85

    1M ctx|Open Source
    61%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

    Mistral

    $0.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.30

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.62 per million tokens by choosing Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base over Llama 4 Maverick.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Llama 4 MaverickMistral Small 3.1 24B Base

    Score vs price

    GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceLlama 4 MaverickMistral Small 3.1 24B Base
    Metric
    Llama 4 Maverick
    Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
    Provider
    Provider
    Meta
    Mistral
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-04-05
    2025-03-17
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+70%
    $0.17
    $0.10
    Output Price+183%
    $0.85
    $0.30
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.02
    $0.40
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    1M
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    69.4 tok/s
    137.1 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    5.7%
    69.8%
    37.5%
    69.8%
    33.1%
    59.6%
    53.6%
    85.5%
    81.0%
    73.4%
    59.3%
    61.2%
    90%
    0%
    94.4%
    73.7%
    77.6%
    92.3%
    80.5%
    56.0%
    80.5%
    31.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    Llama 4 Maverick 4|0 Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

    Verdict

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base: the bottom line

    Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base offers significantly lower pricing, while Llama 4 Maverick leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    As of August 26, 2026, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is 61% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens ($0.40 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17 / $0.85 per million tokens ($1.02 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base cost per million tokens?

    Llama 4 Maverick Meta API pricing is $0.17 input and $0.85 output per million tokens via Meta. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base Mistral API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    Llama 4 Maverick has a published LiveCodeBench score of 43.4%. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    Llama 4 Maverick supports a 1M token context window, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports 128K tokens. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    Llama 4 Maverick leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks versus Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base better for production use?

    Both Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base in my app?

    Yes. Call Llama 4 Maverick through Meta and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    Llama 4 Maverick supports up to 1M output tokens per request, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    Llama 4 Maverick runs at approximately 69.4 tokens/second while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base runs at 137.1 tokens/second. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17/M input and $0.85/M output. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.