Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Llama 4 Maverick is 50% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct. Llama 4 Maverick is $0.17 / $0.85 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct at $0.22 / $1.80. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    Better value

    Llama 4 Maverick

    Meta

    $1.02blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.17

    Output

    $0.85

    1M ctx|Open Source
    50%
    cheaper

    Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

    Qwen

    $2.02blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.22

    Output

    $1.80

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.00 per million tokens by choosing Llama 4 Maverick over Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Llama 4 MaverickQwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

    Score vs price

    Alder Polyglot. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceLlama 4 MaverickQwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
    Metric
    Llama 4 Maverick
    Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Meta
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-04-05
    2025-01-31
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-23%
    $0.17
    $0.22
    Output Price-53%
    $0.85
    $1.80
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.02
    $2.02
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    1M
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    69.4 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    5.7%
    69.8%
    69.8%
    33.1%
    59.6%
    53.6%
    15.6%
    61.8%
    85.5%
    73.4%
    61.2%
    68.7%
    90%
    0%
    94.4%
    73.7%
    77.6%
    92.3%
    55.8%
    80.5%
    31.1%
    31.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    Llama 4 Maverick 0|1 Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

    Verdict

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct: the bottom line

    Llama 4 Maverick offers significantly lower pricing, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    As of August 25, 2026, Llama 4 Maverick is 50% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17 per million input tokens and $0.85 per million output tokens ($1.02 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs $0.22 / $1.80 per million tokens ($2.02 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Llama 4 Maverick Meta API pricing is $0.17 input and $0.85 output per million tokens via Meta. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct OpenRouter API pricing is $0.22 input and $1.80 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 69.6%. Llama 4 Maverick does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    Llama 4 Maverick supports a 1M token context window, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports 1M tokens. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Llama 4 Maverick's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct better for production use?

    Both Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 4 Maverick has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Llama 4 Maverick through Meta and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    Llama 4 Maverick supports up to 1M output tokens per request, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

    Llama 4 Maverick has a measured throughput of approximately 69.4 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17/M input and $0.85/M output. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs $0.22/M input and $1.80/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.