Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2.5

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, MiMo-V2.5 is 5% cheaper per million tokens than Gemma 4 26B-A4B. Gemma 4 26B-A4B is $0.13 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens versus MiMo-V2.5 at $0.17 / $0.34. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B

    Google

    $0.53blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.13

    Output

    $0.40

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    5%
    cheaper
    Better value

    MiMo-V2.5

    Xiaomi

    $0.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.17

    Output

    $0.34

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.03 per million tokens by choosing MiMo-V2.5 over Gemma 4 26B-A4B.

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2.5 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    SciCode. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemma 4 26B-A4BMiMo-V2.5
    Metric
    Gemma 4 26B-A4B
    MiMo-V2.5
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Xiaomi
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-04-02
    2026-04-22
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-23%
    $0.13
    $0.17
    Output Price+19%
    $0.40
    $0.34
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.53
    $0.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    131.1K
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-01-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    87 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    17.2%
    82.3%
    81.6%
    40.0%
    43.1%
    73.8%
    77.9%
    86.3%
    81%
    80%
    88.3%
    63.2%
    59.9%
    0%
    3.7%
    83.5%
    55.1%
    88.5%
    82.4%
    31.9%
    72.2%
    58.1%
    82.6%
    82.9%
    44.1%
    87.2%
    43.3%
    85.5%
    71.8%
    87.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 4 26B-A4B 1|5 MiMo-V2.5

    Verdict

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2.5: the bottom line

    MiMo-V2.5 offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2.5 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2.5?

    As of August 25, 2026, MiMo-V2.5 is 5% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.17 per million input tokens and $0.34 per million output tokens ($0.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemma 4 26B-A4B costs $0.13 / $0.40 per million tokens ($0.53 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2.5 cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B Gemini API pricing is $0.13 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Google. MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi API pricing is $0.17 input and $0.34 output per million tokens via Xiaomi. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2.5?

    MiMo-V2.5 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 71%. Gemma 4 26B-A4B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2.5?

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B supports a 262K token context window, while MiMo-V2.5 supports 1M tokens. MiMo-V2.5 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2.5?

    MiMo-V2.5 leads on 5 of 6 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 4 26B-A4B's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 4 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2.5 better for production use?

    Both Gemma 4 26B-A4B and MiMo-V2.5 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, MiMo-V2.5 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 4 26B-A4B and MiMo-V2.5 in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 4 26B-A4B through Google and MiMo-V2.5 through Xiaomi with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2.5 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Xiaomi API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 4 26B-A4B and MiMo-V2.5?

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while MiMo-V2.5 supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2.5?

    MiMo-V2.5 has a measured throughput of approximately 87 tokens/second. Throughput data for Gemma 4 26B-A4B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2.5 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 4 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2.5 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2.5 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 4 26B-A4B costs $0.13/M input and $0.40/M output. MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.17/M input and $0.34/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.