Who ranks #1 on the EMB leaderboard?
As of August 20, 2026, Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic ranks #1 on EMB at 73.7%. API pricing is $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output.
As of August 20, 2026, Claude Fable 5 is #1 for EMB at 73.7%. Ranked by the EMB score 40 models in this index have a published EMB score. EMB leaderboard with live API prices. EMB โ Vals.ai economics and market benchmark.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
The index
282 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab โ every model page stays linked here.







As of August 20, 2026, Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic is #1 for EMB at 73.7%. Ranked by the EMB score This board also tracks EMB. Next on the same board: Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. This emb leaderboard ranks models by EMB. Scores come from public evals. Prices are the live API rates in the table above.
Sources: OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)
| Rank | Model | EMB | Input /M | Output /M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5 | 73.7% | $10.00 | $50.00 |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5 | 73.6% | $5.00 | $25.00 |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 72.3% | $5.00 | $30.00 |
| 4 | Gemini 3.7 Flash | 71.3% | $0.75 | $3.75 |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 69.4% | $5.00 | $25.00 |
| 6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 67.6% | $2.00 | $12.00 |
| 7 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 67.1% | $0.20 | $1.20 |
| 8 | Kimi K3 | 66.4% | $3.00 | $15.00 |
Rank one eval at a time. All LLM benchmarks.
As of August 20, 2026, Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic ranks #1 on EMB at 73.7%. API pricing is $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output.
The current EMB ranking as of August 20, 2026 is 1. Claude Fable 5 at 73.7%; 2. Claude Opus 5 at 73.6%; 3. GPT-5.6 Sol at 72.3%.
MiMo-V2.5 is the cheapest scored model on this emb leaderboard at $0.17/M input and $0.34/M output ($0.50 blended). Claude Fable 5 still leads EMB at 73.7%.
Not automatically. Claude Fable 5 leads EMB, but a cheaper scored model can be the better production choice if the quality gap is small. Use the table to weigh EMB against input/output price, context window, and related evals.
Scores and API prices on this page are refreshed from published evals and provider rates. The snapshot is labeled August 20, 2026. Treat it as a current index, not a one-off blog post.
EMB โ Vals.ai economics and market benchmark. This page ranks models that have published a EMB score, with live API token prices on the same row.
This page is the EMB leaderboard. Models are sorted by EMB, with input and output token prices on the same row so you can weigh score against cost. Official boards often omit price; that comparison is the point of this index.
Official eval pages own the methodology. This page keeps the published EMB score next to live API $/M so you can pick a production SKU, not only a trophy number.