MiniMax M1 80K vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 93% cheaper per million tokens than MiniMax M1 80K. MiniMax M1 80K is $0.55 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct at $0.09 / $0.09. Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    MiniMax M1 80K

    MiniMax

    $2.75blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.55

    Output

    $2.20

    1M ctx|Open Source
    93%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

    Qwen

    $0.18blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.09

    Output

    $0.09

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $2.57 per million tokens by choosing Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct over MiniMax M1 80K.

    MiniMax M1 80K vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    MiniMax M1 80KQwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

    Score vs price

    SWE-bench Verified. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceMiniMax M1 80KQwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
    Metric
    MiniMax M1 80K
    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    MiniMax
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-06-16
    2024-09-19
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+511%
    $0.55
    $0.09
    Output Price+2344%
    $2.20
    $0.09
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.75
    $0.18
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    40K
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    42 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    8.4%
    70%
    18.5%
    76.9%
    86%
    96.8%
    75.1%
    83%
    92.7%
    57.2%
    70.5%
    91.1%
    46.2%
    61.5%
    90.2%
    81.1%
    50.4%
    77.5%
    43.1%
    54.2%
    80.8%
    86.8%
    Benchmark Wins
    MiniMax M1 80K 3|0 Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

    Verdict

    MiniMax M1 80K vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct: the bottom line

    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while MiniMax M1 80K leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    MiniMax M1 80K vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 80K or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 93% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.09 per million output tokens ($0.18 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). MiniMax M1 80K costs $0.55 / $2.20 per million tokens ($2.75 blended). Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does MiniMax M1 80K vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    MiniMax M1 80K MiniMax API pricing is $0.55 input and $2.20 output per million tokens via MiniMax. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct Qwen API pricing is $0.09 input and $0.09 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, MiniMax M1 80K or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    MiniMax M1 80K leads on SWE-bench Verified: MiniMax M1 80K at 56% vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct at 9%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for MiniMax M1 80K vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    MiniMax M1 80K supports a 1M token context window, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. MiniMax M1 80K offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, MiniMax M1 80K or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    MiniMax M1 80K leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is MiniMax M1 80K or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct better for production use?

    Both MiniMax M1 80K and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between MiniMax M1 80K and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call MiniMax M1 80K through MiniMax and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this MiniMax M1 80K vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published MiniMax API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for MiniMax M1 80K and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    MiniMax M1 80K supports up to 40K output tokens per request, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, MiniMax M1 80K or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct has a measured throughput of approximately 42 tokens/second. Throughput data for MiniMax M1 80K is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this MiniMax M1 80K vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open MiniMax M1 80K or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    MiniMax M1 80K vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. MiniMax M1 80K costs $0.55/M input and $2.20/M output. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.