Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 40% cheaper per million tokens than Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512). Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) is $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct at $0.09 / $0.09. Sources: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)

    Mistral

    $0.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.15

    Output

    $0.15

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    40%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

    Qwen

    $0.18blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.09

    Output

    $0.09

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.12 per million tokens by choosing Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct over Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512).

    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

    Score vs price

    LiveCodeBench. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceMinistral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
    Metric
    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512)
    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Mistral
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-12-04
    2024-09-19
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+67%
    $0.15
    $0.09
    Output Price+67%
    $0.15
    $0.09
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.30
    $0.18
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    262.1K
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    237.5 tok/s
    42 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    66.8%
    61.6%
    31.4%
    78.7%
    86%
    75.1%
    83%
    92.7%
    57.2%
    70.5%
    91.1%
    46.2%
    90.2%
    50.4%
    77.5%
    43.1%
    54.2%
    80.8%
    Benchmark Wins
    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) 1|0 Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

    Verdict

    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct: the bottom line

    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 40% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.09 per million output tokens ($0.18 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.15 / $0.15 per million tokens ($0.30 blended). Sources: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) Mistral API pricing is $0.15 input and $0.15 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct Qwen API pricing is $0.09 input and $0.09 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 9%. Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) supports a 262K token context window, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct better for production use?

    Both Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) through Mistral AI and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Mistral API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) supports up to 262K output tokens per request, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) runs at approximately 237.5 tokens/second while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct runs at 42 tokens/second. Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Ministral 3 (8B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output via Mistral AI. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.