Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is 5% cheaper per million tokens than Phi 4. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens versus Phi 4 at $0.07 / $0.14. Source: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/cognitive-services/openai-service/

    Source: Microsoft pricing (https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/cognitive-services/openai-service/)

    Better value

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

    Microsoft

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    128K ctx|Open Source
    5%
    cheaper

    Phi 4

    Microsoft

    $0.21blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.07

    Output

    $0.14

    16K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.01 per million tokens by choosing Phi-3.5-mini-instruct over Phi 4.

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each pricePhi-3.5-mini-instructPhi 4
    Metric
    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
    Phi 4
    Provider
    Provider
    Microsoft
    Microsoft
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-08-23
    2024-12-12
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+43%
    $0.10
    $0.07
    Output Price-29%
    $0.10
    $0.14
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.20
    $0.21
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    16K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    16K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2024-06-01
    Throughput
    23 tok/s
    33 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    30.4%
    56.1%
    56.1%
    63%
    55.4%
    13.8%
    28.8%
    69%
    84.8%
    69.4%
    62.8%
    82.6%
    48.5%
    80.4%
    84.6%
    37%
    75.4%
    78%
    75.5%
    25.9%
    86.2%
    47.6%
    69.6%
    61.7%
    62.2%
    46.5%
    63.1%
    47.9%
    80.6%
    47.4%
    70.4%
    79.2%
    56.2%
    81%
    41.9%
    21.3%
    77%
    84.1%
    74.7%
    24.3%
    68.5%
    Benchmark Wins
    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct 0|7 Phi 4

    Verdict

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4: the bottom line

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while Phi 4 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct or Phi 4?

    As of August 25, 2026, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is 5% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Phi 4 costs $0.07 / $0.14 per million tokens ($0.21 blended). Sources: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/cognitive-services/openai-service/ and https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/cognitive-services/openai-service/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4 cost per million tokens?

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct Microsoft API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via Microsoft. Phi 4 Microsoft API pricing is $0.07 input and $0.14 output per million tokens via Microsoft. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct or Phi 4?

    Phi 4 leads on HumanEval: Phi-3.5-mini-instruct at 62.8% vs Phi 4 at 82.6%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4?

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct supports a 128K token context window, while Phi 4 supports 16K tokens. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct or Phi 4?

    Phi 4 leads on 7 of 7 shared benchmarks versus Phi-3.5-mini-instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Phi-3.5-mini-instruct or Phi 4 better for production use?

    Both Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Phi 4 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Phi 4 in my app?

    Yes. Call Phi-3.5-mini-instruct through Microsoft and Phi 4 through Microsoft with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Microsoft API pricing and Microsoft API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/cognitive-services/openai-service/ and https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/cognitive-services/openai-service/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Phi 4?

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while Phi 4 supports up to 16K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct or Phi 4?

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct runs at approximately 23 tokens/second while Phi 4 runs at 33 tokens/second. Phi 4 is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Phi-3.5-mini-instruct or Phi 4 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output. Phi 4 costs $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.