Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 91% cheaper per million tokens than Jamba 1.5 Large. Jamba 1.5 Large is $2.00 / $8.00 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct at $0.20 / $0.70. Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Jamba 1.5 Large

    AI21 Labs

    $10.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $2.00

    Output

    $8.00

    256K ctx|Open Source
    91%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

    Qwen

    $0.90blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $0.70

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $9.10 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct over Jamba 1.5 Large.

    Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Jamba 1.5 LargeQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

    Score vs price

    GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceJamba 1.5 LargeQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
    Metric
    Jamba 1.5 Large
    Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    AI21 Labs
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-08-22
    2025-09-22
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+900%
    $2.00
    $0.20
    Output Price+1043%
    $8.00
    $0.70
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $10.00
    $0.90
    Model Details
    Context Window
    256K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    256K
    32.8K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2024-03-05
    N/A
    Throughput
    42 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    36.9%
    70.4%
    27%
    85.8%
    30.3%
    60.4%
    48.9%
    69.3%
    81.2%
    85%
    71.3%
    87%
    85%
    93%
    65.4%
    66.3%
    67.7%
    80.7%
    63.5%
    85.5%
    39.4%
    43%
    87%
    50.6%
    71.6%
    62.5%
    60.2%
    68.1%
    81.3%
    53.5%
    77.8%
    70.9%
    88.4%
    74.2%
    72.1%
    62.9%
    66.1%
    72.3%
    90.3%
    47.5%
    44.3%
    73.7%
    94.7%
    53.1%
    58.2%
    58.3%
    74.5%
    68.7%
    48.5%
    82.6%
    Benchmark Wins
    Jamba 1.5 Large 0|3 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

    Verdict

    Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: the bottom line

    Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Jamba 1.5 Large or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 91% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens ($0.90 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Jamba 1.5 Large costs $2.00 / $8.00 per million tokens ($10.00 blended). Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Jamba 1.5 Large AI21 Labs API pricing is $2.00 input and $8.00 output per million tokens via AI21 Labs. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Qwen API pricing is $0.20 input and $0.70 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Jamba 1.5 Large or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    Jamba 1.5 Large has a published HumanEval score of 71.3%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    Jamba 1.5 Large supports a 256K token context window, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 262K tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Jamba 1.5 Large or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Jamba 1.5 Large's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Jamba 1.5 Large or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct better for production use?

    Both Jamba 1.5 Large and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Jamba 1.5 Large and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Jamba 1.5 Large through AI21 Labs and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published AI21 Labs API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Jamba 1.5 Large and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    Jamba 1.5 Large supports up to 256K output tokens per request, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports up to 33K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Jamba 1.5 Large or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    Jamba 1.5 Large has a measured throughput of approximately 42 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Jamba 1.5 Large or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Jamba 1.5 Large costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.70/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    AI21 Labs

    1 models

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.