Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

    Comparison

    As of September 1, 2026, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 100% cheaper per million tokens than Claude Fable 5.1. Claude Fable 5.1 is $10.00 / $50.00 per million input/output tokens versus Gemma 3n E2B Instructed at $0.02 / $0.04. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)

    Claude Fable 5.1

    Anthropic

    $60.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $10.00

    Output

    $50.00

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    100%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

    Google

    $0.06blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.02

    Output

    $0.04

    32K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $59.94 per million tokens by choosing Gemma 3n E2B Instructed over Claude Fable 5.1.

    Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude Fable 5.1
    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Google
    License
    Proprietary
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2026-09-01
    2025-06-26
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+49900%
    $10.00
    $0.02
    Output Price+124900%
    $50.00
    $0.04
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $60.00
    $0.06
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    32K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-06
    2024-06-01
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    65%
    24.8%
    73.4%
    67.4%
    90%
    77.8%
    80.2%
    6.7%
    60.1%
    66.5%
    91.3%
    43.7%
    42.6%
    2.5%
    85.4%
    55.1%
    94%
    66.7%
    27.7%
    38.6%
    56.6%
    53.1%
    93%
    40.5%
    8.1%
    22.3%
    77.9%
    87.6%
    42.7%

    Verdict

    Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Claude Fable 5.1's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

    As of September 1, 2026, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 100% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed costs $0.02 per million input tokens and $0.04 per million output tokens ($0.06 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 / $50.00 per million tokens ($60.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed cost per million tokens?

    Claude Fable 5.1 Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $10.00 input and $50.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed Gemini API pricing is $0.02 input and $0.04 output per million tokens via Google. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

    Claude Fable 5.1 has a published SWE-bench Pro score of 81.2%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

    Claude Fable 5.1 supports a 1M token context window, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports 32K tokens. Claude Fable 5.1 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

    Shared benchmark scores for Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed better for production use?

    Both Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude Fable 5.1 through Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed through Google with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Gemini API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

    Claude Fable 5.1 supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed?

    Neither Claude Fable 5.1 nor Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    345 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.