Composer 2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is 83% cheaper per million tokens than Composer 2. Composer 2 is $0.50 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens versus Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 at $0.10 / $0.40. Sources: https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2 and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_3-nemotron-super-49b-v1

    Sources: Cursor pricing (https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2); NVIDIA pricing (https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_3-nemotron-super-49b-v1)

    Composer 2

    Cursor

    $3.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.50

    Output

    $2.50

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    83%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

    NVIDIA

    $0.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.40

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $2.50 per million tokens by choosing Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 over Composer 2.

    Composer 2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Composer 2
    Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
    Provider
    Provider
    Cursor
    NVIDIA
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-03-19
    2025-03-18
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+400%
    $0.50
    $0.10
    Output Price+525%
    $2.50
    $0.40
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $3.00
    $0.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2023-12-31
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    66.7%
    61.3%
    Roboflow Vision: SAM3 Birds
    89%
    Roboflow Vision: Local Video
    78%
    Roboflow Vision: RTSP Stream
    0%
    Roboflow Vision: Avocados
    80%
    Roboflow Vision: LPR
    39%
    58.4%
    96.6%
    88.3%
    73.7%
    91.3%
    91.7%

    Verdict

    Composer 2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Composer 2's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Composer 2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Composer 2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is 83% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Composer 2 costs $0.50 / $2.50 per million tokens ($3.00 blended). Sources: https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2 and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_3-nemotron-super-49b-v1. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Composer 2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 cost per million tokens?

    Composer 2 Cursor API pricing is $0.50 input and $2.50 output per million tokens via Cursor. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 NVIDIA API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via NVIDIA. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Composer 2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    Neither Composer 2 nor Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for Composer 2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    Composer 2 supports a 200K token context window, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 supports 131K tokens. Composer 2 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Composer 2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    Shared benchmark scores for Composer 2 and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Composer 2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 better for production use?

    Both Composer 2 and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Composer 2 and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 in my app?

    Yes. Call Composer 2 through Cursor and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 through NVIDIA with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Composer 2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Cursor API pricing and NVIDIA API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2 and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_3-nemotron-super-49b-v1. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Composer 2 and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    Composer 2 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Composer 2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    Neither Composer 2 nor Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Composer 2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Composer 2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Composer 2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Composer 2 costs $0.50/M input and $2.50/M output. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Cursor

    1 models

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.