DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Ling-3.0-flash

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Ling-3.0-flash is 91% cheaper per million tokens than DeepSeek-R1-0528. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is $0.55 / $2.19 per million input/output tokens versus Ling-3.0-flash at $0.06 / $0.18. Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/

    Sources: DeepSeek API pricing (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing); inclusionAI pricing (https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/)

    DeepSeek-R1-0528

    DeepSeek

    $2.74blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.55

    Output

    $2.19

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    91%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Ling-3.0-flash

    inclusionAI

    $0.24blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.06

    Output

    $0.18

    262.1K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $2.50 per million tokens by choosing Ling-3.0-flash over DeepSeek-R1-0528.

    DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Ling-3.0-flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    DeepSeek-R1-0528
    Ling-3.0-flash
    Provider
    Provider
    DeepSeek
    inclusionAI
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2025-05-28
    2026-07-23
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+817%
    $0.55
    $0.06
    Output Price+1117%
    $2.19
    $0.18
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.74
    $0.24
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131.1K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    131.1K
    32.8K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    9 tok/s
    1000 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    17.7%
    81%
    76.3%
    8.9%
    92.3%
    1.1%
    87.5%
    91.4%
    96.6%
    64.3%
    79.4%
    85%
    93.4%
    40.8%

    Verdict

    DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Ling-3.0-flash: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Ling-3.0-flash has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless DeepSeek-R1-0528's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Ling-3.0-flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or Ling-3.0-flash?

    As of August 20, 2026, Ling-3.0-flash is 91% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens ($0.24 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). DeepSeek-R1-0528 costs $0.55 / $2.19 per million tokens ($2.74 blended). Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Ling-3.0-flash cost per million tokens?

    DeepSeek-R1-0528 DeepSeek API pricing is $0.55 input and $2.19 output per million tokens via DeepSeek. Ling-3.0-flash inclusionAI API pricing is $0.06 input and $0.18 output per million tokens via inclusionAI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or Ling-3.0-flash?

    DeepSeek-R1-0528 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 44.6%. Ling-3.0-flash does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Ling-3.0-flash?

    DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports a 131K token context window, while Ling-3.0-flash supports 262K tokens. Ling-3.0-flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or Ling-3.0-flash?

    Shared benchmark scores for DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Ling-3.0-flash are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is DeepSeek-R1-0528 or Ling-3.0-flash better for production use?

    Both DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Ling-3.0-flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Ling-3.0-flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Ling-3.0-flash in my app?

    Yes. Call DeepSeek-R1-0528 through DeepSeek and Ling-3.0-flash through inclusionAI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Ling-3.0-flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published DeepSeek API pricing and inclusionAI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Ling-3.0-flash?

    DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Ling-3.0-flash supports up to 33K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or Ling-3.0-flash?

    DeepSeek-R1-0528 runs at approximately 9 tokens/second while Ling-3.0-flash runs at 1000 tokens/second. Ling-3.0-flash is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Ling-3.0-flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open DeepSeek-R1-0528 or Ling-3.0-flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Ling-3.0-flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. DeepSeek-R1-0528 costs $0.55/M input and $2.19/M output. Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    0 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.