Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V3 0324

    Comparison

    As of September 1, 2026, DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 98% cheaper per million tokens than Claude Fable 5.1. Claude Fable 5.1 is $10.00 / $50.00 per million input/output tokens versus DeepSeek-V3 0324 at $0.28 / $1.14. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); DeepSeek API pricing (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing)

    Claude Fable 5.1

    Anthropic

    $60.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $10.00

    Output

    $50.00

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    98%
    cheaper
    Better value

    DeepSeek-V3 0324

    DeepSeek

    $1.42blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.28

    Output

    $1.14

    163.8K ctx|Open Source
    Save $58.58 per million tokens by choosing DeepSeek-V3 0324 over Claude Fable 5.1.

    Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V3 0324 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude Fable 5.1
    DeepSeek-V3 0324
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    DeepSeek
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-09-01
    2025-03-25
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+3471%
    $10.00
    $0.28
    Output Price+4286%
    $50.00
    $1.14
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $60.00
    $1.42
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    163.8K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    163.8K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-06
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    65%
    68.4%
    67.6%
    73.4%
    67.4%
    35.8%
    90%
    77.8%
    80.2%
    37.8%
    59.4%
    94%
    75.5%
    91.3%
    43.7%
    42.6%
    54.7%
    0%
    85.4%
    94%
    66.7%
    1.7%
    66.9%
    82%
    91.7%
    93%
    81.2%
    77.9%
    87.6%
    27.2%
    71.1%

    Verdict

    Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V3 0324: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 0324 has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Claude Fable 5.1's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V3 0324 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V3 0324?

    As of September 1, 2026, DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 98% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. DeepSeek-V3 0324 costs $0.28 per million input tokens and $1.14 per million output tokens ($1.42 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 / $50.00 per million tokens ($60.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V3 0324 cost per million tokens?

    Claude Fable 5.1 Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $10.00 input and $50.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. DeepSeek-V3 0324 DeepSeek API pricing is $0.28 input and $1.14 output per million tokens via DeepSeek. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V3 0324?

    Claude Fable 5.1 has a published SWE-bench Pro score of 81.2%. DeepSeek-V3 0324 does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V3 0324?

    Claude Fable 5.1 supports a 1M token context window, while DeepSeek-V3 0324 supports 164K tokens. Claude Fable 5.1 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V3 0324?

    Shared benchmark scores for Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek-V3 0324 are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V3 0324 better for production use?

    Both Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek-V3 0324 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, DeepSeek-V3 0324 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek-V3 0324 in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude Fable 5.1 through Anthropic and DeepSeek-V3 0324 through DeepSeek with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V3 0324 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and DeepSeek API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek-V3 0324?

    Claude Fable 5.1 supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while DeepSeek-V3 0324 supports up to 164K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V3 0324?

    Neither Claude Fable 5.1 nor DeepSeek-V3 0324 has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V3 0324 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek-V3 0324 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek-V3 0324 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output. DeepSeek-V3 0324 costs $0.28/M input and $1.14/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    345 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.