Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is 98% cheaper per million tokens than Claude Opus 4.6. Claude Opus 4.6 is $5.00 / $25.00 per million input/output tokens versus DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp at $0.27 / $0.41. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); DeepSeek API pricing (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing)

    Claude Opus 4.6

    Anthropic

    $30.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $5.00

    Output

    $25.00

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    98%
    cheaper
    Better value

    DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

    DeepSeek

    $0.68blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.27

    Output

    $0.41

    163.8K ctx|Open Source
    Save $29.32 per million tokens by choosing DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp over Claude Opus 4.6.

    Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude Opus 4.6
    DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    DeepSeek
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-02-05
    2025-09-29
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+1752%
    $5.00
    $0.27
    Output Price+5998%
    $25.00
    $0.41
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $30.00
    $0.68
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    163.8K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    65.5K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-05-31
    N/A
    Throughput
    42 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    53.1%
    19.8%
    91.3%
    79.9%
    88.4%
    27.6%
    84%
    40.1%
    41.0%
    97.1%
    68.8%
    79.8%
    37.7%
    72.7%
    62.7%
    77.3%
    91.1%
    77.4%
    40.7%
    99.8%
    89.3%
    56.7%
    32.4%
    70.7%
    73.8%
    91.3%
    78.3%
    83.6%
    76.3%
    48.2%
    86.7%
    85%
    76%
    34.9%
    67.6%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude Opus 4.6 8|1 DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

    Verdict

    Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: the bottom line

    DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp offers significantly lower pricing, while Claude Opus 4.6 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

    As of August 20, 2026, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is 98% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens ($0.68 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00 / $25.00 per million tokens ($30.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp cost per million tokens?

    Claude Opus 4.6 Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $5.00 input and $25.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp DeepSeek API pricing is $0.27 input and $0.41 output per million tokens via DeepSeek. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

    Claude Opus 4.6 leads on SWE-bench Verified: Claude Opus 4.6 at 80.8% vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp at 67.8%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

    Claude Opus 4.6 supports a 1M token context window, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp supports 164K tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

    Claude Opus 4.6 leads on 8 of 9 shared benchmarks versus DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better for production use?

    Both Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude Opus 4.6 through Anthropic and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp through DeepSeek with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and DeepSeek API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

    Claude Opus 4.6 supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp supports up to 66K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

    Claude Opus 4.6 has a measured throughput of approximately 42 tokens/second. Throughput data for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp costs $0.27/M input and $0.41/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.