DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 49% cheaper per million tokens than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is $0.44 / $1.32 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct at $0.20 / $0.70. Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: DeepSeek API pricing (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

    DeepSeek

    $1.76blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.44

    Output

    $1.32

    1M ctx|Open Source
    49%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

    Qwen

    $0.90blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $0.70

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.86 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct over DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731.

    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
    Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    DeepSeek
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-07-31
    2025-09-22
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+120%
    $0.44
    $0.20
    Output Price+89%
    $1.32
    $0.70
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.76
    $0.90
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    65.5K
    32.8K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    5.860066709299238 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    70.4%
    91.0%
    54.4%
    53.3%
    49.9%
    34.7%
    27%
    85.8%
    61.4%
    30.3%
    70.3%
    60.4%
    48.9%
    94.4%
    69.3%
    85%
    85%
    66.3%
    67.7%
    80.7%
    63.5%
    85.5%
    61.9%
    16.6%
    77.5%
    76.7%
    59.6%
    57.0%
    43%
    50.6%
    71.6%
    62.5%
    60.2%
    41.4%
    80.4%
    81.3%
    86.2%
    77.8%
    70.9%
    88.4%
    74.2%
    72.1%
    62.9%
    66.1%
    72.3%
    54.2%
    90.3%
    47.5%
    44.3%
    73.7%
    94.7%
    50.7%
    53.1%
    70.7%
    74.5%
    68.7%
    82.6%
    Benchmark Wins
    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 3|0 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

    Verdict

    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: the bottom line

    Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 49% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens ($0.90 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 costs $0.44 / $1.32 per million tokens ($1.76 blended). Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 DeepSeek API pricing is $0.44 input and $1.32 output per million tokens via DeepSeek. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Qwen API pricing is $0.20 input and $0.70 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 88.8%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 supports a 1M token context window, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 262K tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct better for production use?

    Both DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 through DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published DeepSeek API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 supports up to 66K output tokens per request, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports up to 33K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has a measured throughput of approximately 5.860066709299238 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 costs $0.44/M input and $1.32/M output. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.70/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.