DeepSeek VL2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is 82% cheaper per million tokens than DeepSeek VL2. DeepSeek VL2 is $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens versus Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 at $0.10 / $0.40. Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_3-nemotron-super-49b-v1

    Sources: DeepSeek API pricing (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing); NVIDIA pricing (https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_3-nemotron-super-49b-v1)

    DeepSeek VL2

    DeepSeek

    $2.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $2.50

    129.3K ctx|Open Source
    82%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

    NVIDIA

    $0.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.40

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $2.30 per million tokens by choosing Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 over DeepSeek VL2.

    DeepSeek VL2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    DeepSeek VL2
    Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
    Provider
    Provider
    DeepSeek
    NVIDIA
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-12-13
    2025-03-18
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+200%
    $0.30
    $0.10
    Output Price+525%
    $2.50
    $0.40
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.80
    $0.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    129.3K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    129.3K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2023-12-31
    Throughput
    22 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    66.7%
    58.4%
    96.6%
    51.1%
    81.4%
    88.3%
    73.7%
    86%
    93.3%
    78.1%
    62.8%
    91.3%
    79.6%
    79.2%
    22.5%
    61.3%
    63.6%
    91.7%
    81.1%
    68.4%
    84.2%

    Verdict

    DeepSeek VL2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless DeepSeek VL2's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    DeepSeek VL2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, DeepSeek VL2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is 82% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). DeepSeek VL2 costs $0.30 / $2.50 per million tokens ($2.80 blended). Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_3-nemotron-super-49b-v1. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does DeepSeek VL2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 cost per million tokens?

    DeepSeek VL2 DeepSeek API pricing is $0.30 input and $2.50 output per million tokens via Replicate. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 NVIDIA API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via NVIDIA. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, DeepSeek VL2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    Neither DeepSeek VL2 nor Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for DeepSeek VL2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    DeepSeek VL2 supports a 129K token context window, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 supports 131K tokens. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, DeepSeek VL2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    Shared benchmark scores for DeepSeek VL2 and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is DeepSeek VL2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 better for production use?

    Both DeepSeek VL2 and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between DeepSeek VL2 and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 in my app?

    Yes. Call DeepSeek VL2 through Replicate and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 through NVIDIA with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this DeepSeek VL2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published DeepSeek API pricing and NVIDIA API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_3-nemotron-super-49b-v1. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for DeepSeek VL2 and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    DeepSeek VL2 supports up to 129K output tokens per request, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, DeepSeek VL2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

    DeepSeek VL2 has a measured throughput of approximately 22 tokens/second. Throughput data for Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this DeepSeek VL2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open DeepSeek VL2 or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    DeepSeek VL2 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. DeepSeek VL2 costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output via Replicate. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.