DeepSeek VL2 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Mistral NeMo Instruct is 89% cheaper per million tokens than DeepSeek VL2. DeepSeek VL2 is $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens versus Mistral NeMo Instruct at $0.15 / $0.15. Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: DeepSeek API pricing (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    DeepSeek VL2

    DeepSeek

    $2.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $2.50

    129.3K ctx|Open Source
    89%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Mistral NeMo Instruct

    Mistral

    $0.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.15

    Output

    $0.15

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $2.50 per million tokens by choosing Mistral NeMo Instruct over DeepSeek VL2.

    DeepSeek VL2 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    DeepSeek VL2
    Mistral NeMo Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    DeepSeek
    Mistral
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-12-13
    2024-07-18
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+100%
    $0.30
    $0.15
    Output Price+1567%
    $2.50
    $0.15
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.80
    $0.30
    Model Details
    Context Window
    129.3K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    129.3K
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    22 tok/s
    42 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    68%
    51.1%
    83.5%
    81.4%
    86%
    93.3%
    78.1%
    62.8%
    79.6%
    79.2%
    22.5%
    61.3%
    63.6%
    81.1%
    60.6%
    68.4%
    84.2%
    73.8%
    50.3%
    76.8%

    Verdict

    DeepSeek VL2 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Mistral NeMo Instruct has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless DeepSeek VL2's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    DeepSeek VL2 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, DeepSeek VL2 or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    As of August 30, 2026, Mistral NeMo Instruct is 89% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Mistral NeMo Instruct costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens ($0.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). DeepSeek VL2 costs $0.30 / $2.50 per million tokens ($2.80 blended). Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does DeepSeek VL2 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct cost per million tokens?

    DeepSeek VL2 DeepSeek API pricing is $0.30 input and $2.50 output per million tokens via Replicate. Mistral NeMo Instruct Mistral API pricing is $0.15 input and $0.15 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, DeepSeek VL2 or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    Neither DeepSeek VL2 nor Mistral NeMo Instruct has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for DeepSeek VL2 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    DeepSeek VL2 supports a 129K token context window, while Mistral NeMo Instruct supports 128K tokens. DeepSeek VL2 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, DeepSeek VL2 or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    Shared benchmark scores for DeepSeek VL2 and Mistral NeMo Instruct are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is DeepSeek VL2 or Mistral NeMo Instruct better for production use?

    Both DeepSeek VL2 and Mistral NeMo Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Mistral NeMo Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between DeepSeek VL2 and Mistral NeMo Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call DeepSeek VL2 through Replicate and Mistral NeMo Instruct through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this DeepSeek VL2 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published DeepSeek API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for DeepSeek VL2 and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    DeepSeek VL2 supports up to 129K output tokens per request, while Mistral NeMo Instruct supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, DeepSeek VL2 or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

    DeepSeek VL2 runs at approximately 22 tokens/second while Mistral NeMo Instruct runs at 42 tokens/second. Mistral NeMo Instruct is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this DeepSeek VL2 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open DeepSeek VL2 or Mistral NeMo Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    DeepSeek VL2 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. DeepSeek VL2 costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output via Replicate. Mistral NeMo Instruct costs $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.