DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, MiMo-V2-Flash is 25% cheaper per million tokens than DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is $0.13 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens versus MiMo-V2-Flash at $0.10 / $0.30. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

    Google

    $0.53blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.13

    Output

    $0.40

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    25%
    cheaper
    Better value

    MiMo-V2-Flash

    Xiaomi

    $0.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.30

    256K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.13 per million tokens by choosing MiMo-V2-Flash over DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B.

    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-Flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    HLE. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceDiffusionGemma 26B-A4BMiMo-V2-Flash
    Metric
    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B
    MiMo-V2-Flash
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Xiaomi
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-06-10
    2025-12-16
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+30%
    $0.13
    $0.10
    Output Price+33%
    $0.40
    $0.30
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.53
    $0.40
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    16.4K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-01-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    11.9%
    22.1%
    73.2%
    83.7%
    59.3%
    25.9%
    1336.80
    58.3%
    54.3%
    81.5%
    94.1%
    69.1%
    47.6%
    0%
    84.4%
    60.6%
    70.5%
    77.6%
    84.9%
    45.7%
    32%
    56.2%
    80.3%
    Benchmark Wins
    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B 0|4 MiMo-V2-Flash

    Verdict

    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-Flash: the bottom line

    MiMo-V2-Flash offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-Flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2-Flash?

    As of August 30, 2026, MiMo-V2-Flash is 25% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens ($0.40 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B costs $0.13 / $0.40 per million tokens ($0.53 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-Flash cost per million tokens?

    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B Gemini API pricing is $0.13 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Google. MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Xiaomi. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2-Flash?

    MiMo-V2-Flash has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 73.4%. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-Flash?

    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B supports a 262K token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2-Flash?

    MiMo-V2-Flash leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks versus DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for production use?

    Both DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B and MiMo-V2-Flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, MiMo-V2-Flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B and MiMo-V2-Flash in my app?

    Yes. Call DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B through Google and MiMo-V2-Flash through Xiaomi with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-Flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Xiaomi API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B and MiMo-V2-Flash?

    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while MiMo-V2-Flash supports up to 16K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2-Flash?

    Neither DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B nor MiMo-V2-Flash has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-Flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B or MiMo-V2-Flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B vs MiMo-V2-Flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B costs $0.13/M input and $0.40/M output. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.