Who ranks #1 on the C Eval leaderboard?
As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.6 Plus by Qwen ranks #1 on C Eval at 93.3%. API pricing is $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output.
As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.6 Plus is #1 for C Eval at 93.3%. Ranked by the C Eval score 11 models in this index have a published C Eval score. C Eval leaderboard: rank models by C Eval next to live API token prices.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
The index
282 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab โ every model page stays linked here.







As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.6 Plus by Qwen is #1 for C Eval at 93.3%. Ranked by the C Eval score This board also tracks C Eval. Next on the same board: Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. This c eval leaderboard ranks models by C Eval. Scores come from public evals. Prices are the live API rates in the table above.
Sources: OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)
| Rank | Model | C Eval | Input /M | Output /M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen3.6 Plus | 93.3% | $0.50 | $3.00 |
| 2 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | 93% | $0.60 | $3.60 |
| 3 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | 91.9% | $0.40 | $3.20 |
| 4 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 91.5% | $0.43 | $0.87 |
| 5 | Qwen3.6-27B | 91.4% | $0.60 | $3.60 |
| 6 | Qwen3.5-27B | 90.5% | $0.30 | $2.40 |
| 7 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | 90.2% | $0.25 | $2.00 |
| 8 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | 90% | $0.14 | $1.00 |
Rank one eval at a time. All LLM benchmarks.
As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.6 Plus by Qwen ranks #1 on C Eval at 93.3%. API pricing is $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output.
The current C Eval ranking as of August 20, 2026 is 1. Qwen3.6 Plus at 93.3%; 2. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B at 93%; 3. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B at 91.9%.
Qwen3.5-9B is the cheapest scored model on this c eval leaderboard at $0.10/M input and $0.15/M output ($0.25 blended). Qwen3.6 Plus still leads C Eval at 93.3%.
Not automatically. Qwen3.6 Plus leads C Eval, but a cheaper scored model can be the better production choice if the quality gap is small. Use the table to weigh C Eval against input/output price, context window, and related evals.
Scores and API prices on this page are refreshed from published evals and provider rates. The snapshot is labeled August 20, 2026. Treat it as a current index, not a one-off blog post.
C Eval is a public LLM eval (the C Eval score). This page ranks models that have published a score, next to live API prices.
This page is the C Eval leaderboard. Models are sorted by C Eval, with input and output token prices on the same row so you can weigh score against cost. Official boards often omit price; that comparison is the point of this index.
Official eval pages own the methodology. This page keeps the published C Eval score next to live API $/M so you can pick a production SKU, not only a trophy number.