Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3 1B

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Gemma 3 1B is 95% cheaper per million tokens than Codestral-22B. Codestral-22B is $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens versus Gemma 3 1B at $0.02 / $0.04. Sources: https://mistral.ai/technology/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing

    Sources: Mistral AI pricing (https://mistral.ai/technology/pricing); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)

    Codestral-22B

    Mistral

    $1.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $0.90

    32.8K ctx|Open Source
    95%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Gemma 3 1B

    Google

    $0.06blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.02

    Output

    $0.04

    32.8K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.14 per million tokens by choosing Gemma 3 1B over Codestral-22B.

    Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3 1B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Codestral-22BGemma 3 1B

    Score vs price

    HumanEval. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceCodestral-22BGemma 3 1B
    Metric
    Codestral-22B
    Gemma 3 1B
    Provider
    Provider
    Mistral
    Google
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-05-29
    2025-03-12
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+1400%
    $0.30
    $0.02
    Output Price+2150%
    $0.90
    $0.04
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.20
    $0.06
    Model Details
    Context Window
    32.8K
    32.8K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    19.2%
    2.2%
    80.2%
    7.2%
    81.1%
    41.5%
    48%
    51.3%
    1.4%
    62.8%
    15.8%
    78.2%
    35.2%
    14.7%
    34%
    63.5%
    35.9%
    Benchmark Wins
    Codestral-22B 2|0 Gemma 3 1B

    Verdict

    Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3 1B: the bottom line

    Gemma 3 1B offers significantly lower pricing, while Codestral-22B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3 1B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Codestral-22B or Gemma 3 1B?

    As of August 30, 2026, Gemma 3 1B is 95% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 3 1B costs $0.02 per million input tokens and $0.04 per million output tokens ($0.06 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Codestral-22B costs $0.30 / $0.90 per million tokens ($1.20 blended). Sources: https://mistral.ai/technology/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3 1B cost per million tokens?

    Codestral-22B Mistral API pricing is $0.30 input and $0.90 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Gemma 3 1B Gemini API pricing is $0.02 input and $0.04 output per million tokens via Google. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Codestral-22B or Gemma 3 1B?

    Gemma 3 1B has a published LiveCodeBench score of 1.9%. Codestral-22B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3 1B?

    Codestral-22B supports a 33K token context window, while Gemma 3 1B supports 33K tokens. Both models have the same context window size. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Codestral-22B or Gemma 3 1B?

    Codestral-22B leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 3 1B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Codestral-22B or Gemma 3 1B better for production use?

    Both Codestral-22B and Gemma 3 1B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 3 1B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Codestral-22B and Gemma 3 1B in my app?

    Yes. Call Codestral-22B through Mistral AI and Gemma 3 1B through Google with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3 1B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Mistral API pricing and Gemini API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://mistral.ai/technology/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Codestral-22B and Gemma 3 1B?

    Codestral-22B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Gemma 3 1B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Codestral-22B or Gemma 3 1B?

    Neither Codestral-22B nor Gemma 3 1B has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3 1B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Codestral-22B or Gemma 3 1B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Codestral-22B vs Gemma 3 1B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Codestral-22B costs $0.30/M input and $0.90/M output via Mistral AI. Gemma 3 1B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.