Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 84% cheaper per million tokens than Llama 4 Scout. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is $0.02 / $0.04 per million input/output tokens versus Llama 4 Scout at $0.08 / $0.30. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)

    Better value

    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

    Google

    $0.06blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.02

    Output

    $0.04

    32K ctx|Proprietary
    84%
    cheaper

    Llama 4 Scout

    Meta

    $0.38blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.08

    Output

    $0.30

    10M ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.32 per million tokens by choosing Gemma 3n E2B Instructed over Llama 4 Scout.

    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemma 3n E2B InstructedLlama 4 Scout
    Metric
    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
    Llama 4 Scout
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Meta
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-06-26
    2025-04-05
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-75%
    $0.02
    $0.08
    Output Price-87%
    $0.04
    $0.30
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.06
    $0.38
    Model Details
    Context Window
    32K
    10M
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    10M
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2024-06-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    76.1 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    24.8%
    57.2%
    57.2%
    13.2%
    32.8%
    17.0%
    6.7%
    60.1%
    79.6%
    69.4%
    66.5%
    50.3%
    88.8%
    0%
    94.4%
    2.5%
    55.1%
    27.7%
    38.6%
    70.7%
    56.6%
    67.8%
    53.1%
    90.6%
    40.5%
    74.3%
    8.1%
    22.3%
    31.5%
    42.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed 0|6 Llama 4 Scout

    Verdict

    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout: the bottom line

    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed offers significantly lower pricing, while Llama 4 Scout leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or Llama 4 Scout?

    As of August 30, 2026, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 84% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed costs $0.02 per million input tokens and $0.04 per million output tokens ($0.06 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08 / $0.30 per million tokens ($0.38 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed Gemini API pricing is $0.02 input and $0.04 output per million tokens via Google. Llama 4 Scout Meta API pricing is $0.08 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or Llama 4 Scout?

    Llama 4 Scout leads on LiveCodeBench: Gemma 3n E2B Instructed at 13.2% vs Llama 4 Scout at 32.8%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout?

    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports a 32K token context window, while Llama 4 Scout supports 10M tokens. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or Llama 4 Scout?

    Llama 4 Scout leads on 6 of 6 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 3n E2B Instructed's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or Llama 4 Scout better for production use?

    Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Llama 4 Scout are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Llama 4 Scout in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 3n E2B Instructed through Google and Llama 4 Scout through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and Llama 4 Scout?

    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Llama 4 Scout supports up to 10M output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or Llama 4 Scout?

    Llama 4 Scout has a measured throughput of approximately 76.1 tokens/second. Throughput data for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or Llama 4 Scout from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.